Literature DB >> 11292502

Comparing increment and decrement probes in the probed-sinewave paradigm.

S S Wolfson1, N Graham.   

Abstract

Using the probed-sinewave paradigm, we explore the differences between increment and decrement probes across a range of frequencies (approx. 1-19 Hz). In this paradigm, detection threshold is measured for a small test probe presented on a large sinusoidally flickering background (at eight different phases). Probe thresholds are very similar for increment and decrement probes, but there is a very small (and systematic) difference: increment thresholds are usually slightly higher relative to decrement thresholds during the part of the cycle when the background's intensity is increasing. Although Wilson's (1997, Vis. Neuro., 14, 403-423) model substantially underestimates the size of this difference, it predicts some phase dependency. However, the existence of On- and Off-pathways in Wilson's model is not important for these predictions. A recent model by Snippe, Poot, and van Hateren (2000, Vis. Neuro., 17, 449-462) may be able to predict this result by using explicit contrast-gain control rather than separate On- and Off-pathways. Auxiliary experiments measuring the perceived polarity of the probe provide a further argument suggesting that separate On- and Off-pathways are not useful in explaining increment and decrement probe thresholds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11292502     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00009-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Retinal ganglion cell adaptation to small luminance fluctuations.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Gilberto Graña; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Element-arrangement textures in multiple objective tasks.

Authors:  S Sabina Wolfson; Norma Graham
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2005

3.  Macaque ganglion cell responses to probe stimuli on modulated backgrounds.

Authors:  Barry B Lee; Hao Sun; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Black-white asymmetry in visual perception.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; George Sperling
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Detecting contrast changes in invisible patterns during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Bjorn Hubert-Wallander; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Interocular ND filter suppression: Eccentricity and luminance polarity effects.

Authors:  Akash S Chima; Monika A Formankiewicz; Sarah J Waugh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.