Literature DB >> 11292132

How much surplus capacity is required to maintain low waiting times?

S J Thomas1, M V Williams, N G Burnet, C R Baker.   

Abstract

Random fluctuations in demand make it impossible to see all patients in a very short time scale unless capacity exceeds the mean demand. We describe a model to estimate the capacity levels required as a function of mean demand. Random fluctuations were assumed to follow a Poisson distribution. A Monte Carlo analysis was used to model variations in length of waiting times. To see patients without a waiting list the capacity must exceed mean demand by an amount proportional to the square root of the mean; if capacity equals mean demand, then actual demand will exceed capacity almost half the time. The smaller the mean demand, the greater the percentage increase in capacity that is required. Thus, subdivision of numbers, for subspecialization or fast-tracking, demands greater overall capacity. When multiple serial steps are required, each step must have spare capacity if a waiting list is to be avoided. When capacity is only slightly greater than mean demand, random fluctuations mean that targets can be met for long stretches of time, but these are interspersed with periods when the waiting list rises substantially. Allowing a small waiting time (2-4 weeks) considerably reduces the excess capacity required. Targets such as the 2-week wait for cancer referrals can be achieved only if resource levels are set to give considerably more patient slots per week than mean demand. The level of spare capacity required depends on the level of demand and the maximum waiting time permitted. Without surplus capacity, waiting targets cannot be met. To meet the 2-week waiting target, capacity must exceed mean demand by two patient slots per week for 99% success, or by one slot per week for 90% success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11292132     DOI: 10.1053/clon.2001.9210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  4 in total

1.  Two week rule for cancer referrals. Reducing waiting times from diagnosis to treatment might be more effective.

Authors:  S Thomas; N Burnet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-13

2.  Does wait-list size at registration influence time to surgery? Analysis of a population-based cardiac surgery registry.

Authors:  Boris Sobolev; Adrian Levy; Robert Hayden; Lisa Kuramoto
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Modelling the throughput capacity of a single-accelerator multitreatment room proton therapy centre.

Authors:  A H Aitkenhead; D Bugg; C G Rowbottom; E Smith; R I Mackay
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The occurrence of adverse events in relation to time after registration for coronary artery bypass surgery: a population-based observational study.

Authors:  Boris G Sobolev; Guy Fradet; Lisa Kuramoto; Basia Rogula
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 1.637

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.