Literature DB >> 11291451

Marine oil pollution and beached bird surveys: the development of a sensitive monitoring instrument.

C J Camphuysen1, M Heubeck.   

Abstract

One of the most obvious adverse effects of (chronic) pollution of the world's oceans and seas with mineral oil is the mortality of seabirds. Systematic surveys of beachcast corpses of birds ('beached bird surveys') have been used in many parts of the world to document the effect of oil pollution, but particularly so in Western Europe and in parts of North America. In this paper, the history, current schemes, methods and possible (future) use of beached bird surveys are described and discussed, because the value of beached bird surveys has been hotly disputed. Oil pollution is known since the late 19th century, while the first beached bird surveys were conducted in the 1920s. Due to the amount of man-power needed for these surveys, most beached bird survey programs thrived only through the work of a large number of volunteers. However, most programs have resulted in substantial amounts of high quality data, often covering many consecutive years. One of the main shortcomings of many beached bird survey programs was the emphasis on stranded bird numbers rather than on relative measures, such as oil rates (percentage of corpses oiled of all corpses found). Sources of pollution, particularly so in chronically polluted regions such as the North Sea, the Baltic, the Mediterranean and the waters around Newfoundland, are insufficiently known, but could be studied through a sampling program connected to beached bird surveys. Suggestions for standardization of methods are presented, which could lead to a global and highly sensitive monitoring instrument of marine oil pollution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11291451     DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(00)00138-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  7 in total

1.  Characterizing shipboard bilgewater effluent before and after treatment.

Authors:  Christine McLaughlin; Debra Falatko; Robin Danesi; Ryan Albert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Design, development and demonstration of an improved bird washing machine.

Authors:  H Rajabi; H Monsef; M Moghadami; M Zare; A Armandei
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Decline of birds in a human modified coastal dune forest landscape in South Africa.

Authors:  Morgan J Trimble; Rudi J van Aarde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Environmental Predictors of Seabird Wrecks in a Tropical Coastal Area.

Authors:  Davi Castro Tavares; Jailson Fulgencio de Moura; Salvatore Siciliano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Challenges to Oil Spill Assessment for Seabirds in the Deep Ocean.

Authors:  J Christopher Haney; Patrick G R Jodice; William A Montevecchi; David C Evers
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Light to intermediate oil sheens increase Manx shearwater feather permeability.

Authors:  E Murphy; M Jessopp; J Darby
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.653

7.  Phocine distemper outbreak, The Netherlands, 2002.

Authors:  Jolianne M Rijks; Marco W G Van de Bildt; Trine Jensen; Joost D W Philippa; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Thijs Kuiken
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.883

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.