Literature DB >> 11291185

Semantic factors in the production of number agreement.

J Barker1, J Nicol, M Garrett.   

Abstract

This paper examines the role of semantic factors in the production of subject-verb number agreement. As an ostensibly grammatical process, number agreement provides an interesting case for examining the flow and interaction of semantic and syntactic information through the language-production system. Using a sentence-completion task, agreement errors can be elicited from subjects by presenting them with sentence fragments containing a complex noun-phrase, in which the nonhead noun is plural (e.g., The key to the cabinets ... WERE missing.). Previous research has demonstrated that the probability of making an error can be affected by varying the properties of the nouns in the complex noun phrase. By investigating which variables do and do not affect error rates, constraints on the flow of information through the production system can be inferred. In three experiments, we investigated the possible effects of three different semantic manipulations of the nouns in the complex NP: animacy, semantic overlap, and plausibility of modification by the sentence predicate. We found that both animacy and semantic relatedness had reliable effects on error rates, indicating that the mechanism involved in implementing agreement cannot be blind to semantic information. However, the plausibility with which each noun could serve as the subject of the sentence predicate had no effect on error rates. Taken together, these results suggest that while semantic information is visible to the agreement mechanism, there are still constraints on when this information can affect the process. Specifically, it may be the case that only information contained within the complex NP is considered for the purposes of implementing agreement.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11291185     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005208308278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  5 in total

1.  Broken agreement.

Authors:  K Bock; C A Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: is proximity concord syntactic or linear?

Authors:  G Vigliocco; J Nicol
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

3.  Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: differences in the role of conceptual constraints.

Authors:  G Vigliocco; B Butterworth; M F Garrett
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-12

4.  Effects of clausal structure on subject-verb agreement errors.

Authors:  J L Nicol
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1995-11

5.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech.

Authors:  W J Levelt
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-07
  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Late L2ers can acquire grammatical features that do not occur in their L1: Evidence from the effect of animacy on verb agreement in L1 Chinese.

Authors:  Henrietta Lempert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

2.  Hierarchical structure and memory mechanisms in agreement attraction.

Authors:  Julie Franck; Matthew Wagers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Encoding and Retrieval Interference in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Agreement.

Authors:  Sandra Villata; Whitney Tabor; Julie Franck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-19

5.  The Reading Signatures of Agreement Attraction.

Authors:  Sol Lago; Carlos Acuña Fariña; Enrique Meseguer
Journal:  Open Mind (Camb)       Date:  2021-11-01

6.  Keeping it simple: studying grammatical encoding with lexically reduced item sets.

Authors:  Alma Veenstra; Daniel J Acheson; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.