BACKGROUND: The low level of response (LR) to alcohol is genetically influenced in both humans and animals, and a low LR is a characteristic of offspring of alcoholics that has been reported to predict alcoholism 10 and 15 years later. The genes that contribute to a low LR have not yet been identified. METHODS: A 12-item questionnaire that measures LR, the Self Rating of the Effects of Alcohol (SRE) instrument, was filled out by 745 individuals from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) for whom genetic material was available. These subjects were genotyped by using 336 markers with an average heterozygosity of 0.74 and an average intermarker distance of 10.5 cM. Both quantitative and qualitative nonparametric, sib-pair analyses were carried out for the SRE measure related to early drinking experiences. RESULTS: Correlations of SRE scores across related individuals were significant and between 0.16 and 0.22 for most values, compared with nonsignificant correlations of 0.03 or less among unrelated individuals. Linkage analyses performed by using the FIRST 5 variables (first five times alcohol is consumed) identified four chromosomal regions with lod scores > or = 2.0 whose maximum was also near a marker. One of these chromosomal regions previously was linked to alcohol dependence in the COGA sample. CONCLUSIONS: These data document the familial nature of a low LR to alcohol as measured by the SRE and suggest several chromosomal regions that might contribute to the phenomenon.
BACKGROUND: The low level of response (LR) to alcohol is genetically influenced in both humans and animals, and a low LR is a characteristic of offspring of alcoholics that has been reported to predict alcoholism 10 and 15 years later. The genes that contribute to a low LR have not yet been identified. METHODS: A 12-item questionnaire that measures LR, the Self Rating of the Effects of Alcohol (SRE) instrument, was filled out by 745 individuals from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) for whom genetic material was available. These subjects were genotyped by using 336 markers with an average heterozygosity of 0.74 and an average intermarker distance of 10.5 cM. Both quantitative and qualitative nonparametric, sib-pair analyses were carried out for the SRE measure related to early drinking experiences. RESULTS: Correlations of SRE scores across related individuals were significant and between 0.16 and 0.22 for most values, compared with nonsignificant correlations of 0.03 or less among unrelated individuals. Linkage analyses performed by using the FIRST 5 variables (first five times alcohol is consumed) identified four chromosomal regions with lod scores > or = 2.0 whose maximum was also near a marker. One of these chromosomal regions previously was linked to alcohol dependence in the COGA sample. CONCLUSIONS: These data document the familial nature of a low LR to alcohol as measured by the SRE and suggest several chromosomal regions that might contribute to the phenomenon.
Authors: Marc A Schuckit; Susan Tapert; Scott C Matthews; Martin P Paulus; Neil J Tolentino; Tom L Smith; Ryan S Trim; Shana Hall; Alan Simmons Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith; Brinda K Rana; Lee Ann Mendoza; Dennis Clarke; Mari Kawamura Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Geoff Joslyn; Gerry Brush; Margaret Robertson; Tom L Smith; Jelger Kalmijn; Marc Schuckit; Raymond L White Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: George R Uhl; Tomas Drgon; Catherine Johnson; Oluwatosin O Fatusin; Qing-Rong Liu; Carlo Contoreggi; Chuan-Yun Li; Kari Buck; John Crabbe Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2007-07-25 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Alexander A Bachmanov; Danielle R Reed; Xia Li; Shanru Li; Gary K Beauchamp; Michael G Tordoff Journal: Genome Res Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: George R Uhl; Tomas Drgon; Catherine Johnson; Chuan-Yun Li; Carlo Contoreggi; Judith Hess; Daniel Naiman; Qing-Rong Liu Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 5.691