OBJECTIVE: To compare chemotherapy given at home with outpatient treatment in terms of colorectal cancer patients' safety, compliance, use of health services, quality of life, and satisfaction with treatment. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Large teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 87 patients receiving adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with fluorouracil (with or without folinic acid or levamisole) at outpatient clinic or at home. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment toxicity; patients' compliance with treatment, quality of life, satisfaction with care, and use of health resources. RESULTS:42 patients were treated at outpatient clinic and 45 at home. The two groups were balanced in terms of age, sex, site of cancer, and disease stage. Treatment related toxicity was similar in the two groups (difference 7% (95% confidence interval -12% to 26%)), but there were more voluntary withdrawals from treatment in the outpatient group than in the home group (14% v 2%, difference 12% (1% to 24%)). There were no differences between groups in terms of quality of life scores during and after treatment. Levels of patient satisfaction were higher in the home treatment group, specifically with regard to information received and nursing care. There were no significant differences in use of health services. CONCLUSIONS:Home chemotherapy seemed an acceptable and safe alternative to hospital treatment for patients with colorectal cancer that may improve compliance and satisfaction with treatment.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare chemotherapy given at home with outpatient treatment in terms of colorectal cancerpatients' safety, compliance, use of health services, quality of life, and satisfaction with treatment. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Large teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 87 patients receiving adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with fluorouracil (with or without folinic acid or levamisole) at outpatient clinic or at home. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment toxicity; patients' compliance with treatment, quality of life, satisfaction with care, and use of health resources. RESULTS: 42 patients were treated at outpatient clinic and 45 at home. The two groups were balanced in terms of age, sex, site of cancer, and disease stage. Treatment related toxicity was similar in the two groups (difference 7% (95% confidence interval -12% to 26%)), but there were more voluntary withdrawals from treatment in the outpatient group than in the home group (14% v 2%, difference 12% (1% to 24%)). There were no differences between groups in terms of quality of life scores during and after treatment. Levels of patient satisfaction were higher in the home treatment group, specifically with regard to information received and nursing care. There were no significant differences in use of health services. CONCLUSIONS: Home chemotherapy seemed an acceptable and safe alternative to hospital treatment for patients with colorectal cancer that may improve compliance and satisfaction with treatment.
Authors: D Rischin; M A White; J P Matthews; G C Toner; K Watty; A J Sulkowski; J L Clarke; L Buchanan Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2000-08-07 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: V Mor; M Z Stalker; R Gralla; H I Scher; C Cimma; D Park; A M Flaherty; M Kiss; P Nelson; L Laliberte Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1988 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Pascal Jean-Pierre; Kevin Fiscella; Karen M Freund; Jack Clark; Julie Darnell; Alan Holden; Douglas Post; Steven R Patierno; Paul C Winters Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lei Zhang; Zhenbo Dai; Siying Cheng; Shumin Xie; Stephanie Mu-Lian Woo; Zhiqin Luo; Jinglian Wu; Tianwen Gao; Jiahao Liu; Kai Zhang; Jing Zhang; Xinyu Jia; Adam R Miller; Changli Wang Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-02-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Bénédicte Mittaine-Marzac; Emmanuel Bagaragaza; Joël Ankri; Philippe Aegerter; Matthieu De Stampa Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: M Panouillères; A Anota; T V Nguyen; A Brédart; J F Bosset; A Monnier; M Mercier; J B Hardouin Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Sandra Beijer; Nicole E G Wijckmans; Erik van Rossum; Cor Spreeuwenberg; Ron A G Winkens; Lisette Ars; Pieter C Dagnelie Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-09-23 Impact factor: 3.603