Literature DB >> 11289619

Suprafascial dissection of the radial forearm flap and donor site morbidity.

C M Avery1, J Pereira, A E Brown.   

Abstract

A cutaneous free radial forearm flap was harvested from 25 patients using a suprafascial dissection technique. The donor site was managed with either a full or split thickness skin graft and a negative pressure wound dressing. The incidence of initial complete graft take was 96% at day 5 and 100% by 1 month. There was 100% early and complete graft take in the full thickness group but one area of partial loss in the split thickness group. This area of graft loss represented less than 0.5% of the total grafted area in this series. The mean time to wound healing was 14 days. There were no cases of tendon exposure or delayed healing. The suprafascial dissection creates a superior graft recipient bed. When combined with the negative pressure wound dressing technique it ensured early and complete graft take.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11289619     DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2000.0016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  10 in total

1.  Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes of Radial Forearm Free Flap Donor Site in the Context of Head and Neck Cancer Reconstruction.

Authors:  Khyati Jani; Nirav Maharaja; Nisha Rajrattansingh Akali; Deepak Balasubramanian; Janarthanan Ramu; Jimmy Mathew; Mohit Sharma; Krishnakumar Thankappan; Subramania Iyer
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-18

Review 2.  [Vacuum-assisted closure of head and neck wounds].

Authors:  H-G Palm; T Hauer; C Simon; C Willy
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Autonomous reparative unit (ARU): a new concept of repairing free flap donor site with local full-thickness skin graft.

Authors:  M Squadrelli-Saraceno; A Compan; G Bimbi; L Gatto; S Riccio; S Colombo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.124

4.  A comparison of full and split thickness skin grafts in radial forearm donor sites.

Authors:  Wellington J Davis; Cindy Wu; David Sieber; Darl K Vandevender
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2011-03-18

Review 5.  Dermal skin substitutes for upper limb reconstruction: current status, indications, and contraindications.

Authors:  Shady A Rehim; Maneesh Singhal; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.907

6.  Reduction of donor site morbidity of free radial forearm flaps: what level of evidence is available?

Authors:  Denys J Loeffelbein; Sammy Al-Benna; Lars Steinsträßer; Robin M Satanovskij; Nils H Rohleder; Thomas Mücke; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Marco R Kesting
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-02-03

7.  Radial forearm free flap surgery: a modified skin-closure technique improving donor-site aesthetic appearance.

Authors:  L Giordano; S Bondi; F Ferrario; B Fabiano; M Bussi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  Long-term follow-up of donor site morbidity after defect coverage with Integra following radial forearm flap elevation.

Authors:  Anna Wirthmann; Juliane C Finke; Pietro Giovanoli; Nicole Lindenblatt
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2014-01-10

9.  Reply to Comment on "Suprafascial 3 Zone Dissection of Internal Pudendal Artery Perforator Flap for Management of Rectovaginal Fistula".

Authors:  Haitham H Khalil; Marco N Malahias; Sharad Karandikar; Charles Hendrickse
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-03-26

10.  Negative-pressure wound therapy for donor-site closure in radial forearm free flap: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kazuki Shimada; Yosuke Ojima; Yukiko Ida; Takako Komiya; Hajime Matsumura
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.