Literature DB >> 11288900

Design of an interface to allow microfluidic electrophoresis chips to drink from the fire hose of the external environment.

S Attiya1, A B Jemere, T Tang, G Fitzpatrick, K Seiler, N Chiem, D J Harrison.   

Abstract

An interface design is presented that facilitates automated sample introduction into an electrokinetic microchip, without perturbing the liquids within the microfluidic device. The design utilizes an interface flow channel with a volume flow resistance that is 0.54-4.1 x 10(6) times lower than the volume flow resistance of the electrokinetic fluid manifold used for mixing, reaction, separation, and analysis. A channel, 300 microm deep, 1 mm wide and 15-20 mm long, was etched in glass substrates to create the sample introduction channel (SIC) for a manifold of electrokinetic flow channels in the range of 10-13 microm depth and 36-275 microm width. Volume flow rates of up to 1 mL/min were pumped through the SIC without perturbing the solutions within the electrokinetic channel manifold. Calculations support this observation, suggesting a leakage flow to electroosmotic flow ratio of 0.1:1% in the electrokinetic channels, arising from 66-700 microL/min pressure-driven flow rates in the SIC. Peak heights for capillary electrophoresis separations in the electrokinetic flow manifold showed no dependence on whether the SIC pump was on or off. On-chip mixing, reaction and separation of anti-ovalbumin and ovalbumin could be performed with good quantitative results, independent of the SIC pump operation. Reproducibility of injection performance, estimated from peak height variations, ranged from 1.5-4%, depending upon the device design and the sample composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11288900     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(200101)22:2<318::AID-ELPS318>3.0.CO;2-G

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrophoresis        ISSN: 0173-0835            Impact factor:   3.535


  7 in total

Review 1.  A review of microdialysis coupled to microchip electrophoresis for monitoring biological events.

Authors:  Rachel A Saylor; Susan M Lunte
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Passively operated microfluidic device for stimulation and secretion sampling of single pancreatic islets.

Authors:  Leah A Godwin; Meagan E Pilkerton; Kennon S Deal; Desiree Wanders; Robert L Judd; Christopher J Easley
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  A fully integrated microfluidic genetic analysis system with sample-in-answer-out capability.

Authors:  Christopher J Easley; James M Karlinsey; Joan M Bienvenue; Lindsay A Legendre; Michael G Roper; Sanford H Feldman; Molly A Hughes; Erik L Hewlett; Tod J Merkel; Jerome P Ferrance; James P Landers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Measurement of microchannel fluidic resistance with a standard voltage meter.

Authors:  Leah A Godwin; Kennon S Deal; Lauren D Hoepfner; Louis A Jackson; Christopher J Easley
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.558

5.  Development and optimization of an integrated PDMS based-microdialysis microchip electrophoresis device with on-chip derivatization for continuous monitoring of primary amines.

Authors:  Pradyot Nandi; David E Scott; Dhara Desai; Susan M Lunte
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  3D-printed Microfluidic Devices: Fabrication, Advantages and Limitations-a Mini Review.

Authors:  Chengpeng Chen; Benjamin T Mehl; Akash S Munshi; Alexandra D Townsend; Dana M Spence; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  Closed-loop feedback control for microfluidic systems through automated capacitive fluid height sensing.

Authors:  L R Soenksen; T Kassis; M Noh; L G Griffith; D L Trumper
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 6.799

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.