Literature DB >> 11288190

The impact of including future medical care costs when estimating the costs attributable to a disease: a colorectal cancer case study.

R Etzioni1, S D Ramsey, K Berry, M Brown.   

Abstract

A source of controversy in the economic literature concerns whether to include or exclude future medical care costs when computing attributable costs for lifesaving interventions. Although it is hypothesized that including future medical care costs will offset the cost savings achieved through prevention, the magnitude of the effect is not known. The objectives of the present study are to develop a methodology for estimating the excess costs of care among colorectal cancer patients, including and excluding future costs of care, and comparing these results with previous studies that do not include costs in added years of life. Subjects in the study included those identified with colorectal cancer drawn from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database and an age- and gender-matched control group drawn from the general Medicare population. Using the Kaplan-Meier Sample Average estimator, we directly estimate expected 11-year costs, and then, with the addition of some simple extrapolating assumptions, determine expected 25-year costs. The latter time horizon captures lifetime costs for over 90% of the cohort. Males results for discounted, stage-specific 11- versus 25-year excess costs: in situ, 22411 dollars versus 23494 dollars; Stage 1, 29365 dollars versus 32510 dollars; Stage 2, 28114 dollars versus 25263 dollars; Stage 3, 27397 dollars versus 19647 dollars; Stage 4, 3006 dollars versus 7837 dollars. Trends were similar for females. It can be concluded that adding costs of care in future years for those whose colorectal cancer is prevented owing to screening greatly alters the estimate of lifetime excess costs for colorectal cancer patients, and can produce negative results for advanced stage disease. The results emphasize the need to adopt a standard approach for dealing with future costs when evaluating lifesaving interventions for cost-effectiveness analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11288190     DOI: 10.1002/hec.580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  10 in total

1.  Cost-utility analysis of chemotherapy regimens in elderly patients with stage III colon cancer.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Rohan C Parikh; Janice N Cormier; Wenyaw Chan; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Incorporating Future Medical Costs: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Michelle Tew; Philip Clarke; Karin Thursky; Kim Dalziel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Economic studies in colorectal cancer: challenges in measuring and comparing costs.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Laurel Borowski; Joseph Lipscomb
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

Review 4.  Cost considerations in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Frank G A Jansman; Maarten J Postma; Jacobus R B J Brouwers
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The societal gain of medical development and innovation in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Caroline M den Hoed; Kees Isendoorn; Wouter Klinkhamer; Anshu Gupta; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 6.  Screening, prevention and socioeconomic costs associated with the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Redaelli; Carole W Cranor; Gary J Okano; Pat Ray Reese
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  An economic viewpoint on alternative strategies for identifying persons with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; Wylie Burke; Lauren Clarke
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Pharmacoeconomic analysis of adjuvant oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-FU/LV in Dukes' C colon cancer: the X-ACT trial.

Authors:  J Cassidy; J-Y Douillard; C Twelves; J J McKendrick; W Scheithauer; I Bustová; P G Johnston; K Lesniewski-Kmak; S Jelic; G Fountzilas; F Coxon; E Díaz-Rubio; T S Maughan; A Malzyner; O Bertetto; A Beham; A Figer; P Dufour; K K Patel; W Cowell; L P Garrison
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  A cardiovascular disease policy model: part 2-preparing for economic evaluation and to assess health inequalities.

Authors:  K D Lawson; J D Lewsey; I Ford; K Fox; L D Ritchie; H Tunstall-Pedoe; G C M Watt; M Woodward; S Kent; M Neilson; A H Briggs
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2016-06-10

10.  Long-term costs of colorectal cancer treatment in Spain.

Authors:  Julieta Corral; Xavier Castells; Eduard Molins; Pietro Chiarello; Josep Maria Borras; Francesc Cots
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.