Literature DB >> 11287744

Rapid multipoint linkage analysis via inheritance vectors in the Elston-Stewart algorithm.

J R O'Connell1.   

Abstract

The calculation of multipoint likelihoods of pedigree data is crucial for extracting the full available information needed for both parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis. Recent mathematical advances in both the Elston-Stewart and Lander-Green algorithms for computing exact multipoint likelihoods of pedigree data have enabled researchers to analyze data sets containing more markers and more individuals both faster and more efficiently. This paper presents novel algorithms that further extend the computational boundary of the Elston-Stewart algorithm. They have been implemented into the software package VITESSE v. 2 and are shown to be several orders of magnitude faster than the original implementation of the Elston-Stewart algorithm in VITESSE v. 1 on a variety of real pedigree data. VITESSE v. 2 was faster by a factor ranging from 168 to over 1,700 on these data sets, thus making a qualitative difference in the analysis. The main algorithm is based on the faster computation of the conditional probability of a component nuclear family within the pedigree by summing over the joint genotypes of the children instead of the parents as done in the VITESSE v. 1. This change in summation allows the parent-child transmission part of the calculation to be not only computed for each parent separately, but also for each locus separately by using inheritance vectors as is done in the Lander-Green algorithm. Computing both of these separately can lead to substantial computational savings. The use of inheritance vectors in the nuclear family calculation represents a partial synthesis of the techniques of the Lander-Green algorithm into the Elston-Stewart algorithm. In addition, the technique of local set recoding is introduced to further reduce the complexity of the nuclear family computation. These new algorithms, however, are not universally faster on all types of pedigree data compared to the method implemented in VITESSE v. 1 of summing over the parents. Therefore, a hybrid algorithm is introduced which combines the strength of both summation methods by using a numerical heuristic to decide which of the two to use for a given nuclear family within the pedigree and is shown to be faster than either method on its own. Finally, this paper discusses various complexity issues regarding both the Elston-Stewart and Lander-Green algorithms and possible future directions of further synthesis. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11287744     DOI: 10.1159/000053346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  11 in total

1.  Evidence for a novel glaucoma locus at chromosome 3p21-22.

Authors:  Paul N Baird; Simon J Foote; David A Mackey; Jamie Craig; Terence P Speed; Alexandre Bureau
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  The value of molecular haplotypes in a family-based linkage study.

Authors:  E M Gillanders; J V Pearson; A J M Sorant; J M Trent; J R O'Connell; J E Bailey-Wilson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Online system for faster multipoint linkage analysis via parallel execution on thousands of personal computers.

Authors:  M Silberstein; A Tzemach; N Dovgolevsky; M Fishelson; A Schuster; D Geiger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The cluster variation method for efficient linkage analysis on extended pedigrees.

Authors:  Cornelis A Albers; Martijn A R Leisink; Hilbert J Kappen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  A system for exact and approximate genetic linkage analysis of SNP data in large pedigrees.

Authors:  Mark Silberstein; Omer Weissbrod; Lars Otten; Anna Tzemach; Andrei Anisenia; Oren Shtark; Dvir Tuberg; Eddie Galfrin; Irena Gannon; Adel Shalata; Zvi U Borochowitz; Rina Dechter; Elizabeth Thompson; Dan Geiger
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Whole genomewide linkage screen for neural tube defects reveals regions of interest on chromosomes 7 and 10.

Authors:  E Rampersaud; A G Bassuk; D S Enterline; T M George; D G Siegel; E C Melvin; J Aben; J Allen; A Aylsworth; T Brei; J Bodurtha; C Buran; L E Floyd; P Hammock; B Iskandar; J Ito; J A Kessler; N Lasarsky; P Mack; J Mackey; D McLone; E Meeropol; L Mehltretter; L E Mitchell; W J Oakes; J S Nye; C Powell; K Sawin; R Stevenson; M Walker; S G West; G Worley; J R Gilbert; M C Speer
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 7.  A survey of current software for linkage analysis.

Authors:  Frank Dudbridge
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.639

8.  KELVIN: a software package for rigorous measurement of statistical evidence in human genetics.

Authors:  Veronica J Vieland; Yungui Huang; Sang-Cheol Seok; John Burian; Umit Catalyurek; Jeffrey O'Connell; Alberto Segre; William Valentine-Cooper
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 0.444

9.  A Rare Variant Nonparametric Linkage Method for Nuclear and Extended Pedigrees with Application to Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease via WGS Data.

Authors:  Linhai Zhao; Zongxiao He; Di Zhang; Gao T Wang; Alan E Renton; Badri N Vardarajan; Michael Nothnagel; Alison M Goate; Richard Mayeux; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  MLIP: using multiple processors to compute the posterior probability of linkage.

Authors:  Manika Govil; Alberto M Segre; Veronica J Vieland
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.