Literature DB >> 11287024

Paracervical block with and without conscious sedation: a comparison of the pain levels during egg collection and the postoperative side effects.

E H Ng1, D K Chui, O S Tang, P C Ho.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pain levels during egg collection and the subsequent postoperative side effects in patients receiving a paracervical block (PCB) with and without conscious sedation.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study.
SETTING: A tertiary assisted reproduction unit. PATIENT(S): 150 patients undergoing egg collection. INTERVENTION(S): Randomized to receive PCB only (control group) and PCB in conjunction with conscious sedation (sedation group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Vaginal and abdominal pain levels; severity of postoperative side effects. RESULT(S): The median pain levels during vaginal punctures were 12.0 (2.5th--97.5th centiles: 0--84.3) and 30.0 (2.5th--97.5th centiles: 0--100) in the sedation and placebo groups, respectively. The corresponding median abdominal pain levels were 16.5 (2.5th--97.5th centiles: 0--100) and 43.0 (2.5th--97.5th centiles: 0--100). The pain levels were significantly higher in the placebo group than the sedation group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the severity of nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and drowsiness. CONCLUSION(S): Patients who received only a PCB during the egg collection experienced 2.5 times higher levels of vaginal and abdominal pain as compared to those who received both PCB and conscious sedation. The use of PCB along is not recommended for all patients but it may be considered with selected patients after they have been given extensive counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11287024     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01693-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  8 in total

1.  IVF oocyte retrieval: prospective evaluation of the type of anesthesia on live birth rate, pain, and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Lucie Rolland; Jeanne Perrin; Virginie Villes; Valérie Pellegrin; Léon Boubli; Blandine Courbiere
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Anaesthesia for in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  Divya Jain; Amit Kohli; Lalit Gupta; Poonam Bhadoria; Raktima Anand
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2009-08

3.  A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for Conscious Sedation During Oocyte Retrieval in An In Vitro Fertilization Program.

Authors:  Ali Mohamed Ali Elnabtity; Mohamed Fouad Selim
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

4.  Randomized controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain relief during transvaginal oocyte retrieval using conscious sedation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Queenie Ho Yan Wong; Man Wa Lui; Sofie Shuk Fei Yung; Jennifer Ka Yee Ko; Raymond Hang Wun Li; Ernest Hung Yu Ng
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Why do women choose to undergo oocyte aspiration without sedation or analgesia?

Authors:  Daniella Gilboa; Liron Seidman; Polina Kimiagarov; Avia Noni; Ravid Doron; Daniel S Seidman
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2021-04-16

Review 6.  Trends in research on pain relief during oocyte retrieval for IVF/ICSI: a systematic, methodological review.

Authors:  E T I A Buisman; H Grens; R Wang; S Bhattacharya; D D M Braat; A G Huppelschoten; J W van der Steeg
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 7.  Pain relief for women undergoing oocyte retrieval for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Irene Kwan; Rui Wang; Emily Pearce; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-15

8.  Acupuncture for pain relief of women undergoing transvaginal oocyte retrieval: A meta analysis and systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Guo; Xiang Li; Wei Wei; Rong-Rong Wang; Fang Xiao; Li-Ying Liu; Jing Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.