Literature DB >> 11286601

Information and involvement.

H Thornton.   

Abstract

This article discusses the beliefs that provision of good quality information is the key to (a) successful and satisfying involvement of patients in their own decision-making and (b) involvement of lay people in the research process, in debate and other involvement in wider health issues. Education of children, health professionals, the public and the media is advocated, enabling critical appraisal skills and good quality health information to lead to improved involvement of citizens in health-care decisions of all kinds, both individual and societal. Examples of individual, group and specific group involvement through research projects, debates about screening, Citizens' Juries, etc. are used to illustrate benefits to patients and to health provision in general.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11286601      PMCID: PMC5060040          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00129.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  8 in total

Review 1.  Patient information materials in oncology: are they needed and do they work?

Authors:  R Thomas; H Thornton; J Mackay
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.126

2.  Screening mammography re-evaluated.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Breast cancer trials: a patient's viewpoint.

Authors:  H M Thornton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Decision analysis and the implementation of research findings.

Authors:  R J Lilford; S G Pauker; D A Braunholtz; J Chard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-08

5.  Are randomized trials of hormone replacement therapy in symptomatic women with breast cancer feasible?

Authors:  J Marsden; M Whitehead; R A'Hern; M Baum; N Sacks
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?

Authors:  P C Gøtzsche; O Olsen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views.

Authors:  C Meredith; P Symonds; L Webster; D Lamont; E Pyper; C R Gillis; L Fallowfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

8.  'Should a mammographic screening programme carry the warning: screening can damage your health!'?

Authors:  H Thornton; M Baum
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Reporting dates is necessary to establish historical perspective--and validity of references.

Authors:  Hazel Thornton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  A centralised public information resource for randomised trials: a scoping study to explore desirability and feasibility.

Authors:  Anne L Langston; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; Zoë Skea
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Obtaining consumer perspectives using a citizens' jury: does the current country of origin labelling in Australia allow for informed food choices?

Authors:  Elizabeth Withall; Annabelle M Wilson; Julie Henderson; Emma Tonkin; John Coveney; Samantha B Meyer; Jacinta Clark; Dean McCullum; Rachel Ankeny; Paul R Ward
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.