Literature DB >> 11286598

Citizens' expectations and likely use of a NHS Walk-in Centre: results of a survey and qualitative methods of research.

A Chapple1, B Sibbald, A Rogers, M Roland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To find out which groups of people would use a National Health Service walk-in centre that would offer mainly health care advice, staffed by nurses. To understand the circumstances in which people would use a walk-in centre and to ascertain to what extent it would meet patients' expressed health-care needs.
DESIGN: A postal survey of 2400 people plus 27 semi-structured interviews and one focus group. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted in Wakefield, Yorkshire UK, and included both white and ethnic minority groups.
RESULTS: Most people reported that they would use a walk-in centre. It would be more attractive to young as compared with older people, ethnic minority as compared with white people, people who are dissatisfied with access to NHS services and people with urgent health-care problems. People want a wide range of services, including diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and general information. People also want access to both doctors and nurses, to male as well as female practitioners, to counsellors and interpreters. The type of service planned for this walk-in centre will meet some of the expressed needs. However, patients' expectations of the walk-in centre exceed planned provision in a number of key respects.
CONCLUSION: Walk-in centres without GPs and with limited services will disappoint the public. It is important that walk-in centres are evaluated and attention paid to 'local voices' before additional money is allocated for such centres elsewhere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11286598      PMCID: PMC5060042          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00112.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  9 in total

1.  Editorial.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Public participation and marginalized groups: the community development model.

Authors:  Eileen O'Keefe; Christine Hogg
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Needs assessment in primary care: general practitioners' perceptions and implications for the future.

Authors:  J Murie; P Hanlon; J McEwen; E Russell; D Moir; J Gregan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research.

Authors:  D L Morgan
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  1998-05

Review 5.  Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?

Authors:  I T Coyne
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 6.  Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research)

Authors:  T Greenhalgh; R Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-20

7.  Iron deficiency anaemia in women of South Asian descent: a qualitative study.

Authors:  A Chapple
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Patient participation in general practice: who participates?

Authors:  M Agass; A Coulter; D Mant; A Fuller
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  General practitioners' perceptions of the illness behaviour and health needs of South Asian women with menorrhagia.

Authors:  A Chapple; M Ling; C May
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  1998 Feb-May       Impact factor: 2.772

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Navigating and making sense of urgent and emergency care processes and provision.

Authors:  Catherine Pope; Gemma McKenna; Joanne Turnbull; Jane Prichard; Anne Rogers
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.377

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.