Literature DB >> 11286596

Involving consumers in a needs-led research programme: a pilot project.

S Oliver1, R Milne, J Bradburn, P Buchanan, L Kerridge, T Walley, J Gabbay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the methods used for involving consumers in a needs-led health research programme, and to discuss facilitators, barriers and goals.
DESIGN: In a short action research pilot study, we involved consumers in all stages of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme: identifying and prioritizing research topics; commissioning and reporting research; and communicating openly about the programme. We drew on the experience of campaigning, self-help and patients' representative groups, national charities, health information services, consumer researchers and journalists for various tasks. We explored consumer literature as a potential source for research questions, and as a route for disseminating research findings. These innovations were complemented by training, one-to-one support and discussion. A reflective approach included interviews with consumers, co-ordinating staff, external observers and other programme contributors, document analysis and multidisciplinary discussion (including consumers) amongst programme contributors.
RESULTS: When seeking research topics, face-to-face discussion with a consumer group was more productive than scanning consumer research reports or contacting consumer health information services. Consumers were willing and able to play active roles as panel members in refining and prioritizing topics, and in commenting on research plans and reports. Training programmes for consumer involvement in service planning were readily adapted for a research programme. Challenges to be overcome were cultural divides, language barriers and a need for skill development amongst consumers and others. Involving consumers highlighted a need for support and training for all contributors to the programme.
CONCLUSIONS: Consumers made unique contributions to the HTA Programme. Their involvement exposed processes which needed further thought and development. Consumer involvement benefited from the National Co-ordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment (NCCHTA) staff being comfortable with innovation, participative development and team learning. Neither recruitment nor research capacity were insurmountable challenges, but ongoing effort is required if consumer involvement is to be sustained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11286596      PMCID: PMC5060045          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00113.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  3 in total

1.  How can health service users contribute to the NHS research and development programme?

Authors:  S R Oliver
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-05-20

2.  Evidence-based consumer health information: developing teaching in critical appraisal skills.

Authors:  R Milne; S Oliver
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.038

  3 in total
  28 in total

1.  Patients and research.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Consumers are helping to prioritise research.

Authors:  J Royle; S Oliver
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-07

3.  Public involvement in setting a national research agenda: a mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Sandy Oliver; David G Armes; Gill Gyte
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  A consumer network for haematological malignancies.

Authors:  Nicole Skoetz; Olaf Weingart; Andreas Engert
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts.

Authors:  Sophie Staniszewska; Nicola Jones; Mary Newburn; Shanit Marshall
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  A pilot study to identify areas for further improvements in patient and public involvement in health technology assessments for medicines.

Authors:  Josie Messina; David L Grainger
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Involving patients in HTA activities at local level: a study protocol based on the collaboration between researchers and knowledge users.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Johanne Gagnon; Michèle St-Pierre; François-Pierre Gauvin; Florence Piron; Marc Rhainds; Martin Coulombe; Dolores Lepage-Savary; Marie Desmartis; Mylène Tantchou Dipankui; France Légaré
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Introducing the patient's perspective in hospital health technology assessment (HTA): the views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Marie Desmartis; Johanne Gagnon; Michèle St-Pierre; François-Pierre Gauvin; Marc Rhainds; Dolorès Lepage-Savary; Martin Coulombe; Mylène Tantchou Dipankui; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Active Patient Engagement: Long Overdue in Rehabilitation Research.

Authors:  Samantha Louise Harrison; Dina Brooks
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 10.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.