Literature DB >> 11286416

The locomotion of dairy cows on floor surfaces with different frictional properties.

C J Phillips1, I D Morris.   

Abstract

The locomotion of dairy cows was evaluated on floors with a smooth epoxy resin surface or with a surface-applied bauxite aggregate of mean diameter 0.5, 1.2, or 2.5 mm (coefficients of static friction, mu 0.35, 0.42, 0.49, and 0.74, respectively). Locomotion was recorded as cows walked to receive a food reward. Cows on the floor with least friction walked rapidly (0.85 m/s), with frequent, short steps. At the start of the supporting phase the upper limbs were more vertical. Joint arcs during this phase were reduced. Cows on 0.5-mm aggregate also walked rapidly (0.84 m/s); they had the least vertical limb angles and long steps but held the hoof more vertical, probably to offset any increased slip risk. On floors with larger aggregate, cows decreased speed and step frequency but maintained long steps, keeping their upper forelimbs more vertical to reduce the supporting limb phase. It is concluded that on a low friction floor (mu < 0.4), cows walk quickly with frequent, short steps. As mu increases to 0.5, step length increases and the number of steps decreases to maintain speed at increased friction, producing an optimal coefficient of friction between 0.4 and 0.5. Further increases in mu may increase the hanging limb phase at the expense of the supporting limb phase, to reduce friction, while maintaining a long stride to expedite arrival at the reward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11286416     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74517-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  8 in total

1.  Exploring the mechanical basis for acceleration: pelvic limb locomotor function during accelerations in racing greyhounds (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  S B Williams; J R Usherwood; K Jespers; A J Channon; A M Wilson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Lameness Detection in Dairy Cows: Part 1. How to Distinguish between Non-Lame and Lame Cows Based on Differences in Locomotion or Behavior.

Authors:  Annelies Van Nuffel; Ingrid Zwertvaegher; Liesbet Pluym; Stephanie Van Weyenberg; Vivi M Thorup; Matti Pastell; Bart Sonck; Wouter Saeys
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Comparison of milk yield and animal health in Turkish farms with differing stall types and resting surfaces.

Authors:  Nurcan Karslioglu Kara; Askin Galic; Mehmet Koyuncu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Effect of concrete slats, three mat types and out-wintering pads on performance and welfare of finishing beef steers.

Authors:  Bernadette Earley; John D McNamara; Stephen J Jerrams; Edward G O'Riordan
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 1.695

5.  Investigation of feet functions of large ruminants with a decoupled model of equivalent mechanism.

Authors:  Qun Zhang; Kun Xu; Xilun Ding
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 2.422

Review 6.  The Influence of Different Types of Outdoor Access on Dairy Cattle Behavior.

Authors:  Anne-Marieke C Smid; Daniel M Weary; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05-13

7.  Artificial Grass as an Alternative Laneway Surface for Dairy Cows Walking to Pasture.

Authors:  Stephanie Buijs; Gillian Scoley; Deborah McConnell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  Why Is the Grass the Best Surface to Prevent Lameness? Integrative Analysis of Functional Ranges as a Key for Dairy Cows' Welfare.

Authors:  Paul Medina-González; Karen Moreno; Marcelo Gómez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.