Literature DB >> 11286071

Sources of salinity in ground water from Jericho area, Jordan Valley.

A Marie1, A Vengosh.   

Abstract

One of the major problems in the lower Jordan Valley is the increasing salinization (i.e., chloride content) of local ground water. The high levels of salinity limit the utilization of ground water for both domestic and agriculture applications. This joint collaborative study evaluates the sources and mechanisms for salinization in the Jericho area. We employ diagnostic geochemical fingerprinting methods to trace the potential sources of the salinity in (1) the deep confined subaquifer system (K2) of Lower Cenomanian age; (2) the upper subaquifer system (K1) of Upper Cenomanian and Turonian ages; and (3) the shallow aquifer system (Q) of Plio-Pleistocene ages. The chemical composition of the saline ground water from the two Cenomanian subaquifers (K1 and K2) point to a single saline source with Na/Cl approximately 0.5 and Br/Cl approximately 7 x 10(-3). This composition is similar to that of thermal hypersaline spring that are found along the western shore of the Dead Sea (e.g., En Gedi thermal spring). We suggest that the increasing salinity in both K1 and K2 subaquifers is derived from mixing with deep-seated brines that flow through the Rift fault system. The salinization rate depends on the discharge volume of the fresh meteoric water in the Cenomanian Aquifer. In contrast, the chemical composition of ground water from the Plio-Pleistocene Aquifer shows a wide range of Cl- (100-2000 mg/L), Na/Cl (0.4-1.0), Br/Cl (2-6 x 10(-3)), and SO4/Cl (0.01-0.4) ratios. These variations, together with the high SO4(2-), K+, and NO3- concentrations, suggest that the salinity in the shallow aquifer is derived from the combination of (1) upconing of deep brines as reflected by low Na/Cl and high Br/Cl ratios; (2) leaching of salts from the Lisan Formation within the Plio-Pleistocene Aquifer, as suggested by the high SO4(2-) concentrations; and (3) anthropogenic contamination of agriculture return flow and sewage effluents with distinctive high K+ (80 mg/L) and NO3- (80 mg/l) contents and low Br/Cl ratios (2 x 10(-3)). Our data demonstrates that the chemical composition of salinized ground water can be used to delineate the sources of salinity and hence to establish the conceptual model for explaining salinization processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11286071     DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02305.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ground Water        ISSN: 0017-467X            Impact factor:   2.671


  5 in total

1.  Groundwater pollution source apportionment using principal component analysis in a multiple land-use area in southwestern China.

Authors:  Qiling Li; Han Zhang; Shanshan Guo; Kang Fu; Lei Liao; Yi Xu; Siqian Cheng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Geophysical, isotopic, and hydrogeochemical tools to identify potential impacts on coastal groundwater resources from Urmia hypersaline Lake, NW Iran.

Authors:  Vahab Amiri; Mohammad Nakhaei; Razyeh Lak; Majid Kholghi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Evaluating the main sources of groundwater pollution in the southern Tehran aquifer using principal component factor analysis.

Authors:  Hooman Ghahremanzadeh; Roohollah Noori; Akbar Baghvand; Touraj Nasrabadi
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Nitrate in groundwater and agricultural products: intake and risk assessment in northeastern Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Zendehbad; Majid Mostaghelchi; Mohsen Mojganfar; Peter Cepuder; Willibald Loiskandl
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.190

5.  Seasonal and Spatial Variability of Anthropogenic and Natural Factors Influencing Groundwater Quality Based on Source Apportionment.

Authors:  Xueru Guo; Rui Zuo; Li Meng; Jinsheng Wang; Yanguo Teng; Xin Liu; Minhua Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.