Literature DB >> 11285596

Direct coronary stent implantation: safety, feasibility, and predictors of success of the strategy of direct coronary stent implantation.

G Laarman1, T S Muthusamy, H Swart, I Westendorp, F Kiemeneij, T Slagboom, R van der Wieken.   

Abstract

This prospective study was designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, predictive factors of success, and 6-month follow-up of stent implantation without balloon predilatation (direct stenting) in 250 patients undergoing elective stent implantation. Balloon dilatation prior to stent implantation was a prerequisite to facilitate passage and deployment of the stent. Stent technology has changed tremendously, resulting in stents with improved properties, which may allow stent placement without prior balloon dilatation. Patients with coronary lesions suitable for elective stent implantation were included in this trial. Coronary interventions were undertaken predominantly via the transradial route using 6 Fr guiding catheters. Direct stent implantation was attempted using AVE GFX II coronary stent delivery systems. Upon failure, predilatation was undertaken before reattempting stent implantation. Patient data and ECGs were obtained from case records and from personal or telephone interviews 6 months after the procedure. Values were presented as mean +/- standard deviation. Student's t-test, two-tailed at 5% level of significance, was used to compare the difference of two means. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to establish predictive factors for failure of direct stenting. Two hundred and sixty-six direct stent implantations were attempted in 250 patients. Direct stenting was successful in 226 (85%) cases. Out of 40(15%) cases where direct stenting failed, balloon predilatation facilitated stent implantation in 39. In one lesion, stent implantation was not possible despite adequate predilatation. Predictive factors for failure of direct stenting on multivariate analysis were LCx lesions (P < 0.01), complex lesions (P < 0.01), and longer stents (P < 0.001). Minimal luminal diameter and percentage diameter stenosis of lesions in the successful and the failure group were not significantly different (0.94 +/- 0.39 mm vs. 0.84 +/- 0.41 mm, P = NS, and 70.2 +/- 11.2 vs. 73.2 +/- 11.2, P = NS). Stent loss occurred in five (2.0%) cases, with successful retrieval in four. One stent was lost permanently in a small branch of the radial artery. Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (post-PCI) myocardial infarction occurred in four (1.6%) patients. There were no other in-hospital events. Six-month-follow up information was obtained in 99% of patients. Subacute stent thrombosis was noted in four (1.6%) cases. Target vessel-related myocardial infarction rate was 3.2%, of which half was caused by subacute stent thrombosis. The overall reintervention rate (coronary artery bypass grafting or PCI) was 9.7%. Target lesion revascularization by PCI occurred in only 4.0%. At 6 months, overall mortality was 2.0%, of which 1.2% was due to coronary events. Direct stent implantation is safe and feasible in the majority of cases with low rate of complications. Unfavorable factors include circumflex lesion, more complex lesion morphology, and increasing length of stent. Severity of stenosis does not appear to be of predictive value. Long-term outcome is favorable with a low target lesion revascularization rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11285596     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  9 in total

1.  Coronary artery stent dislodgement and aortic dissection in a patient with a severely calcified lesion in the proximal right coronary artery.

Authors:  Koutaro Kagiyama; Toshifumi Shimada; Masaharu Nakano; Kenta Toyomasu; Kazunori Yamaji; Yuji Aoki; Takafumi Ueno; Yoshihiro Fukumoto
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2017-07-27

2.  Coronary stent embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention: Successful retrieval using twisting guide wire technique by radial approach.

Authors:  Franklyn Colón-Arias; Melanie Moronta-Franco; Anthony Gutiérrez-Martínez
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2021-02-08

3.  Efficacy of transradial cerebral angiography in the elderly.

Authors:  Jung-Hyun Park; Dae-Yong Kim; Jin-Wook Kim; Yong-Seok Park; Won-Bae Seung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-04-30

4.  Safety, efficacy and costs associated with direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A IJsselmuiden; P W Serruys; G J Tangelder; T Slagboom; R van der Wieken; F Kiemeneij; G J Laarman
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Successful coronary stent retrieval from the ascending aorta using a gooseneck snare kit.

Authors:  Ji-Hun Jang; Seong-Ill Woo; Dong-Hyeok Yang; Sang-Don Park; Dae-Hyeok Kim; Sung-Hee Shin
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.884

6.  Two dislodged and crushed coronary stents: treatment of two simultaneously dislodged stents using crushing techniques.

Authors:  Dong-Hyeok Yang; Seong-Ill Woo; Dae-Hyeok Kim; Sang-Don Park; Ji-Hun Jang; Jun Kwan; Sung-Hee Shin
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.884

7.  Three cases of non-surgical treatment of stent loss during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Byung-Ju Shim; Jong-Min Lee; Seung-Jae Lee; Sung Sik Kim; Dong-Hyeon Lee; Woo-Seung Shin; Ji-Han Yu; Sang Hyun Gil
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Transradial versus transfemoral approach for cerebral angiography: A prospective comparison.

Authors:  Ziliang Wang; Jinchao Xia; Wei Wang; Gangqin Xu; Jianjun Gu; Yongfeng Wang; Tianxiao Li
Journal:  J Interv Med       Date:  2019-06-27

9.  Feasibility and utility of transradial cerebral angiography: experience during the learning period.

Authors:  Ji Hyung Kim; Yong Sung Park; Chul Gu Chung; Kyeong Sug Park; Dong Jin Chung; Hyun Jin Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.