PURPOSE: Because the capability to control squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck has improved recently, the phenomenon of multiple primary malignancies of that region is now recognized with increasing frequency. We reviewed cases of multiple primary squamous cell carcinomas of the hypopharynx and esophagus with regard to their frequency, incidence, and prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 104 cases of hypopharyngeal cancer to determine (1) if and when esophageal cancer occurred, (2) the classification of multiple tumors as metachronous or synchronous, and (3) tumor histology. RESULTS: In most cases of the metachronous type, esophageal cancer followed hypopharyngeal cancer within less than 3 years. Most cases of hypopharyngeal cancer were at an advanced stage, in contrast to esophageal cancer, which were all early stage. These cases had a poor prognosis despite various treatments causing local disease to be well controlled. Endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection was found to be an effective treatment for esophageal cancer, especially in superficial types. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis and mild systemic damage after endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection compare favorably with surgery, radiation, or systemic chemotherapy.
PURPOSE: Because the capability to control squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck has improved recently, the phenomenon of multiple primary malignancies of that region is now recognized with increasing frequency. We reviewed cases of multiple primary squamous cell carcinomas of the hypopharynx and esophagus with regard to their frequency, incidence, and prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 104 cases of hypopharyngeal cancer to determine (1) if and when esophageal cancer occurred, (2) the classification of multiple tumors as metachronous or synchronous, and (3) tumor histology. RESULTS: In most cases of the metachronous type, esophageal cancer followed hypopharyngeal cancer within less than 3 years. Most cases of hypopharyngeal cancer were at an advanced stage, in contrast to esophageal cancer, which were all early stage. These cases had a poor prognosis despite various treatments causing local disease to be well controlled. Endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection was found to be an effective treatment for esophageal cancer, especially in superficial types. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis and mild systemic damage after endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection compare favorably with surgery, radiation, or systemic chemotherapy.