INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic capacity of a protocol to study syncope of unknown cause in which electrophysiological studies and tilting table tests are selectively used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was performed in 137 consecutive patients (94 men and 43 women, with a mean age of 57.6+/-18.3 years) with syncope of unknown cause after the initial clinical evaluation, who were divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 77 patients meeting any of the following criteria: a) presence of structural heart disease; b) abnormal ECG; c) presence of significant non-symptomatic arrhythmia in the Holter recording, and d) presence of paroxysmal palpitations. These patients initially underwent an electrophysiological study. Group B consisted of 60 patients not meeting any of the above criteria, who were initially submitted to tilting table tests.Results. In group A, the electrophysiological study was positive in 43 patients (55%). In group B, the tilting test was positive in 41 patients (68%). Among patients in group A with a negative study, 20 (59%) were submitted to the tilting table test, with positive results in 7 cases (35%). Five patients from group B with a negative tilting test underwent the electrophysiological study, which was negative in all of them. Overall, a positive diagnosis was achieved in 91 of 137 patients (66%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with syncope of a non-apparent cause in the initial assessment, selective use of electrophysiological studies or tilting table tests, guided by clinical criteria, allows for a positive diagnosis in over 60% of the cases. Our results suggest that the tilting table test should be performed in cases of group A with a negative electrophysiological study.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic capacity of a protocol to study syncope of unknown cause in which electrophysiological studies and tilting table tests are selectively used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was performed in 137 consecutive patients (94 men and 43 women, with a mean age of 57.6+/-18.3 years) with syncope of unknown cause after the initial clinical evaluation, who were divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 77 patients meeting any of the following criteria: a) presence of structural heart disease; b) abnormal ECG; c) presence of significant non-symptomatic arrhythmia in the Holter recording, and d) presence of paroxysmal palpitations. These patients initially underwent an electrophysiological study. Group B consisted of 60 patients not meeting any of the above criteria, who were initially submitted to tilting table tests.Results. In group A, the electrophysiological study was positive in 43 patients (55%). In group B, the tilting test was positive in 41 patients (68%). Among patients in group A with a negative study, 20 (59%) were submitted to the tilting table test, with positive results in 7 cases (35%). Five patients from group B with a negative tilting test underwent the electrophysiological study, which was negative in all of them. Overall, a positive diagnosis was achieved in 91 of 137 patients (66%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with syncope of a non-apparent cause in the initial assessment, selective use of electrophysiological studies or tilting table tests, guided by clinical criteria, allows for a positive diagnosis in over 60% of the cases. Our results suggest that the tilting table test should be performed in cases of group A with a negative electrophysiological study.