Literature DB >> 11281926

Using focus groups to seek the views of patients dying from cancer about the care they receive.

Norma V. Raynes1, Jack M. Leach, Barbara Rawlings, Rebecca J. Bryson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prime purpose of the study was to investigate whether focus groups were a practical way of seeking the views of dying people and whether the information collected added to that collected by more established methods.
DESIGN: A sample frame of Macmillan nurse patients was collated from which three cluster samples were randomly selected to participate in focus groups. The focus groups were structured with an experienced facilitator and recorder to answer three key questions. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients of Macmillan nurses in three NHS Trusts in West Yorkshire who were living at home with incurable cancer. They were aware of their condition and were willing to participate. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: The three key questions were; what kind of help are you currently receiving? What sort of help do you want? Of the kind of help you are receiving what kind is most important to you?
RESULTS: 17 patients participated in three focus groups. Participants were generally fairly able and living with spouses or relatives. They were of varying age with different types and duration of cancer. They were receiving a range of health and social services of varying importance to them. More help was particularly wanted with support for daily living, support from specialist cancer nurses, help getting out and with housework. Macmillan nurses and general practice services were highly rated in some but not all three trust areas.
CONCLUSIONS: We propose that focus groups are a practical way of collecting information about dying patients that can complement other sources of information in planning and auditing the provision of care.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11281926      PMCID: PMC5080965          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00090.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  9 in total

1.  Dying now.

Authors:  E Wilkes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-04-28       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Supporting dying people.

Authors:  S Cowley
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1993 Oct 20-26

3.  Palliative care: views of patients and their families.

Authors:  I Higginson; A Wade; M McCarthy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-08-04

Review 4.  Enabling more dying people to remain at home.

Authors:  G Thorpe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-09

5.  Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staffs' ratings reflect those made by patients or their families?

Authors:  I J Higginson; M McCarthy
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Dying from cancer: results of a national population-based investigation.

Authors:  J Addington-Hall; M McCarthy
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  Changes in life and care in the year before death 1969-1987.

Authors:  A Cartwright
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1991-05

8.  Randomised controlled trial of effects of coordinating care for terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  J M Addington-Hall; L D MacDonald; H R Anderson; J Chamberlain; P Freeling; J M Bland; J Raftery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-28

9.  Unmet needs of persons with cancer in Pennsylvania during the period of terminal care.

Authors:  P S Houts; J M Yasko; H A Harvey; S B Kahn; A J Hartz; J F Hermann; G W Schelzel; M J Bartholomew
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Developing consumer involvement in rural HIV primary care programmes.

Authors:  Edward M Mamary; Kim Toevs; Karla B Burnworth; Lin Becker
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.377

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.