Literature DB >> 11281893

Patient participation groups in general practice in the National Health Service.

Ian Brown1.   

Abstract

General practice remains the organizational hub of first level health services in the United Kingdom. Patient participation groups are probably the most well known model for public participation in this setting and, although still not widespread, they have been a slowly expanding area of development for almost three decades. This paper sets out to critically asses patient participation groups in general practice by considering the context of their development and reviewing the research literature about groups. Critical issues needing more study and key methodological challenges are then discussed. Patient participation groups have been a somewhat shifting and contested phenomenon, embracing trends and changing as policy priorities have changed over the years. There is some evidence to think that they might have potential as a local element within a public participation strategy in the National Health Service. However, the field studies are very limited and more research of a better quality is needed. The state of knowledge is not adequate to be able to say with any confidence if or how such groups should be developed. A better understanding is needed of the public's perspectives on this and other models of participation. There are many other questions to do with patient participation groups' purpose, equitable access, and effectiveness that need to be addressed. The methodological challenges include issues of how to involve all stakeholders in the research process; and how to study less tangible aspects of general practice organization, such as culture and power, that effect the public's participation.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 11281893      PMCID: PMC5060105          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00057.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.318


  13 in total

1.  Foreword.

Authors:  C Waine
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1994-01

2.  'Promoting Better Health'. The Government's programme for improving primary health care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1987-12-05       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Participation: myths, realities and prognosis.

Authors:  A Brownlea
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Researching public health: behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate.

Authors:  F Baum
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Community and participation for general practice: perceptions of general practitioners and community nurses.

Authors:  I Brown
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Professional attitudes to patient participation groups: an exploratory study.

Authors:  J Wood; D H Metcalfe
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1980-09

7.  Partners or partisans? Patient participation at Marylebone Health Centre.

Authors:  P Pietroni; H D Chase
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Patient participation in general practice: who participates?

Authors:  M Agass; A Coulter; D Mant; A Fuller
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  What the patient wants from patient participation.

Authors:  A Hutton; S Robins
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1985-03

10.  Why patient participation groups stop functioning: general practitioners' viewpoint.

Authors:  R G Mann
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-01-19
View more
  5 in total

1.  Developing patient reference groups within general practice: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Jane Smiddy; Joanne Reay; Stephen Peckham; Lorraine Williams; Patricia Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  "They heard our voice!" patient engagement councils in community-based primary care practices: a participatory action research pilot study.

Authors:  Julie Haesebaert; Isabelle Samson; Hélène Lee-Gosselin; Sabrina Guay-Bélanger; Jean-François Proteau; Guy Drouin; Chantal Guimont; Luc Vigneault; Annie Poirier; Priscille-Nice Sanon; Geneviève Roch; Marie-Ève Poitras; Annie LeBlanc; France Légaré
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2020-09-21

3.  Patient participation in research funding: an overview of when, why and how amongst Dutch health funds.

Authors:  Willemijn M den Oudendammer; Jacquelien Noordhoek; Rebecca Y Abma-Schouten; Lieke van Houtum; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Christine W M Dedding
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2019-11-11

4.  Implementing community participation via interdisciplinary teams in primary care: An Irish case study in practice.

Authors:  Edel Tierney; Rachel McEvoy; Ailish Hannigan; Anne E MacFarlane
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  How to engage patients in research and quality improvement in community-based primary care settings: protocol for a participatory action research pilot study.

Authors:  Julie Haesebaert; Isabelle Samson; Hélène Lee-Gosselin; Sabrina Guay-Bélanger; Jean-François Proteau; Guy Drouin; Chantal Guimont; Luc Vigneault; Annie Poirier; Priscille-Nice Sanon; Geneviève Roch; Marie-Ève Poitras; Annie LeBlanc; France Légaré
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2018-10-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.