Literature DB >> 11281881

The price of autonomy.

Michael Baum1, Jayant S. Vaidya.   

Abstract

The randomized controlled trial produces a clash of ethical principles with the need for informed consent (autonomy) in conflict with the principles of beneficence and justice. Informed consent is one of the major rate-limiting factors of recruitment and this delays the discovery of life-saving treatments indirectly. Whilst supporting the concept of non-exploitation we wish to challenge the prevailing dogma by asking the awkward question 'what is the price of autonomy?'. Using breast cancer as an example we have developed a decision model with explicit assumptions allowing numerical values to be fed into a mathematical equation, which calculates the cost in lives. With conservative assumptions we estimate that the price of autonomy is 2500 lives over a 10-year period in the United Kingdom alone. We issue the challenge to health policy makers and ethicists to survey public opinion to determine the value placed on autonomy in the war against cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 11281881      PMCID: PMC5061445          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00029.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  9 in total

1.  Trial subjects must be fully involved in design and approval of trials.

Authors:  Lisa Power
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-28

2.  Studies that do not have informed consent from participants should not be published.

Authors:  Heather Goodare
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-28

3.  Informed consent: edging forwards (and backwards)

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-28

Review 4.  Ethics and evidence based medicine.

Authors:  I Kerridge; M Lowe; D Henry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-11

5.  New method of expressing survival in cancer is popular.

Authors:  J S Vaidya; I Mittra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-04

6.  Informed consent in medical research. Journals should not publish research to which patients have not given fully informed consent--with three exceptions.

Authors:  L Doyal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-04-12

7.  BMJ's present policy (sometimes approving research in which patients have not given fully informed consent) is wholly correct.

Authors:  J S Tobias
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-04-12

8.  Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views.

Authors:  C Meredith; P Symonds; L Webster; D Lamont; E Pyper; C R Gillis; L Fallowfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

9.  Cancer mortality in Europe, 1990-92.

Authors:  F Levi; C La Vecchia; F Lucchini; E Negri
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.497

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  The price of autonomy.

Authors:  Hazel Thornton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Is it better to consent to an RCT or to care? Muetadeltaepsilonnu alphagammaalphanu ("nothing in excess").

Authors:  Didier Dreyfuss
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 17.440

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.