Literature DB >> 11281858

The use of evidence by health care user organizations.

Claire Glenton1, Andrew D. Oxman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the use of research evidence by consumer and patient organizations and the extent to which their goals and activities are consistent with evidence-based health care and patient-centred care.
DESIGN: A mailed survey, telephone and face-to-face interviews of leaders of organizations representing health care users.
SETTING: Norway. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-nine of 109 questionnaires that were mailed were included in our analysis and approximately 20 interviews were conducted with representatives of general consumer and patient advocacy groups and interest groups that focus on particular diseases or disabilities. MEASUREMENTS: Information was collected on the goals of the organizations, the nature of their everyday work, the extent to which research information is required in this work and how research information is accessed and appraised.
RESULTS: An important focus of many user groups is peer support. They tend to emphasize experience-based knowledge. A total of 82% of the respondents said that they often or sometimes had use for research results in their work. Research-based information is most often obtained indirectly through physicians or researchers.
CONCLUSIONS: Norwegian health care user organizations do not appear to promote evidence-based health care. To the extent that they help to disseminate scientific information, they appear to do so uncritically, relying on few sources and traditional authorities.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 11281858      PMCID: PMC5081067          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00002.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  10 in total

1.  A contribution to the philosophy of medicine; the basic models of the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  T S SZASZ; M H HOLLENDER
Journal:  AMA Arch Intern Med       Date:  1956-05

2.  [Evaluation of health information in newspapers and brochures. What can we believe?].

Authors:  L W Johansen; A Bjørndal; S Flottorp; T Grøtting; A D Oxman
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  1996-01-20

3.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango).

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  [Informed patients--pleasure or trouble?].

Authors:  P Hjortdahl
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  1997-08-10

5.  Evidence-based medicine and the Internet.

Authors:  W Hersh
Journal:  ACP J Club       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug

Review 6.  The contribution of health services to the American economy.

Authors:  V R Fuchs
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1966-10

7.  The Internet and the Journal.

Authors:  J P Kassirer; M Angell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  An index of scientific quality for health reports in the lay press.

Authors:  A D Oxman; G H Guyatt; D J Cook; R Jaeschke; N Heddle; J Keller
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Sharing information, sharing responsibility: helping health care consumers make informed decisions.

Authors:  S H Marcus; B S Tuchfeld
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1993

10.  Ontario's health-information service: a province-wide resource for patients.

Authors:  H Koba
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Consumer and professional standards: working towards consensus.

Authors:  C Williamson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-09

2.  Developing patient-centred information for back pain sufferers.

Authors:  Claire Glenton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Quality of information in news media reports about the effects of health interventions: Systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Matt Oxman; Lillebeth Larun; Giordano Pérez Gaxiola; Dima Alsaid; Anila Qasim; Christopher James Rose; Karin Bischoff; Andrew David Oxman
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-06-01

4.  Evaluation of a web portal for improving public access to evidence-based health information and health literacy skills: a pragmatic trial.

Authors:  Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren; Arild Bjørndal; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Sølvi Helseth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Development of a complex intervention to improve health literacy skills.

Authors:  Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren; Stein Danielsen; Elin Opheim; Arild Bjørndal; Liv Merete Reinar; Signe Flottorp; Andrew David Oxman; Sølvi Helseth
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2013-07-31

6.  Who can you trust? A review of free online sources of "trustworthy" information about treatment effects for patients and the public.

Authors:  Andrew D Oxman; Elizabeth J Paulsen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 15: Engaging the public in evidence-informed policymaking.

Authors:  Andrew D Oxman; Simon Lewin; John N Lavis; Atle Fretheim
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2009-12-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.