Literature DB >> 11281469

Psychosocial and other characteristics of women complaining of menorrhagia, with and without actual increased menstrual blood loss.

R Hurskainen1, A M Aalto, J Teperi, S Grenman, A Kivelä, E Kujansuu, S Vuorma, M Yliskoski, J Paavonen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To discover whether psychosocial factors can explain why many women with normal menstrual blood loss seek care for menorrhagia.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparative study of women referred for menorrhagia.
SETTING: Gynaecology departments of all five university teaching hospitals in Finland. SAMPLE: Two hundred and twenty-six women aged 35-49 years complaining of menorrhagia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Several psychosocial factors, seeking medical attention, menstrual blood loss.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of the women had their menstrual blood loss in the normal range (menstrual blood loss <60 mL). By univariate analysis, unemployment, anxiety, perceived inconvenience, abdominal pain, haemoglobin level and serum ferritin concentration distinguished this group of women from those with true menorrhagia. Unemployment, perceived inconvenience, abdominal pain and serum ferritin remained significant variables by multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of women with complaints of menorrhagia have their measured menstrual blood loss within the normal range. Psychosocial factors can have an impact on their seeking health care. Better understanding of the factors, which explain complaints of menorrhagia in women with normal bleeding could improve both medical outcomes and reduce the cost of treatment for menorrhagia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11281469     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00040.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  5 in total

1.  Menstrual symptoms: the importance of social factors in women's experiences.

Authors:  Norma O'Flynn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome measures.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Lori A Boardman; Malcolm G Munro; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Cost effectiveness of endometrial ablation with the NovaSure(®) system versus other global ablation modalities and hysterectomy for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding: US commercial and Medicaid payer perspectives.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Miller; Gregory M Lenhart; Machaon M Bonafede; Cindy M Basinski; Andrea S Lukes; Kathleen A Troeger
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-01-06

4.  Cost-Effectiveness of Global Endometrial Ablation vs. Hysterectomy for Treatment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: US Commercial and Medicaid Payer Perspectives.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Miller; Gregory M Lenhart; Machaon M Bonafede; Andrea S Lukes; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.459

5.  The surgical treatment of idiopathic abnormal uterine bleeding: An analysis of 88 000 patients from the French exhaustive national hospital discharge database from 2009 to 2015.

Authors:  Lucie de Léotoing; Gwendoline Chaize; Jérôme Fernandes; Dusan Toth; Philippe Descamps; Gil Dubernard; Thomas Lafon; Ludovic Lamarsalle; Hervé Fernandez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.