Literature DB >> 11281281

The triangle test statistic (TTS): a test of genetic homogeneity using departure from the triangle constraints in IBD distribution among affected sib-pairs.

M H Dizier1, H Quesneville, B Prum, H Selinger-Leneman, F Clerget-Darpoux.   

Abstract

The proportions of affected sibs sharing 2, 1 or 0 identical by descent parental marker alleles have been shown to conform to the 'triangle constraints' (Suarez, 1978; Holmans, 1993). It has also been shown (Dudoit & Speed, 1999) that the constraints are verified provided certain assumptions hold. In this study we explore a realistic situation in which the constraints fail due to the presence of a factor in which the sibs differ, a factor on which penetrance depends. This factor may be a characteristic of the trait (severe vs. mild form), or the presence/absence of an associated trait or an environmental factor. We show that under such situations, using the triangle constraints may lead to important loss of power to detect linkage by the MLS test. We propose here an alternative approach in order to detect both linkage and heterogeneity.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11281281     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-1809.2000.6450433.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Genet        ISSN: 0003-4800            Impact factor:   1.670


  7 in total

1.  Reporting of linkage results.

Authors:  R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Combined analysis from eleven linkage studies of bipolar disorder provides strong evidence of susceptibility loci on chromosomes 6q and 8q.

Authors:  Matthew B McQueen; B Devlin; Stephen V Faraone; Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar; Pamela Sklar; Jordan W Smoller; Rami Abou Jamra; Margot Albus; Silviu-Alin Bacanu; Miron Baron; Thomas B Barrett; Wade Berrettini; Deborah Blacker; William Byerley; Sven Cichon; Willam Coryell; Nick Craddock; Mark J Daly; J Raymond Depaulo; Howard J Edenberg; Tatiana Foroud; Michael Gill; T Conrad Gilliam; Marian Hamshere; Ian Jones; Lisa Jones; Suh-Hang Juo; John R Kelsoe; David Lambert; Christoph Lange; Bernard Lerer; Jianjun Liu; Wolfgang Maier; James D Mackinnon; Melvin G McInnis; Francis J McMahon; Dennis L Murphy; Markus M Nothen; John I Nurnberger; Carlos N Pato; Michele T Pato; James B Potash; Peter Propping; Ann E Pulver; John P Rice; Marcella Rietschel; William Scheftner; Johannes Schumacher; Ricardo Segurado; Kristel Van Steen; Weiting Xie; Peter P Zandi; Nan M Laird
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Variance calculations for identity-by-descent estimation.

Authors:  Matthew B McQueen; Deborah Blacker; Nan M Laird
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Testing genetic linkage with relative pairs and covariates by quasi-likelihood score statistics.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Jason P Sinnwell; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Searching for epistasis and linkage heterogeneity by correlations of pedigree-specific linkage scores.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Shannon K McDonnell; Erin E Carlson; Stephen N Thibodeau; Janet L Stanford; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Impact of the diagnosis definition on linkage detection.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Dizier; Emmanuelle Génin; Marie Claude Babron; Catherine Bourgain
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  The null distribution of likelihood-ratio statistics in the conditional-logistic linkage model.

Authors:  Yeunjoo E Song; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.