Literature DB >> 11281203

Radiation risk estimates in the beginning of the 21st century.

E Cardis1, D Richardson, A Kesminiene.   

Abstract

In the early years of the 21st century, results from a number of epidemiologic studies of populations with specific ionizing radiation exposures will become available. These include populations with accidental exposures in the former Soviet Union and elsewhere and populations with occupational exposures from routine operations of nuclear power plants. The strengths and limitations of these studies are reviewed together with the radiation protection questions they may answer. Many of these studies will provide specific information to complement the atomic-bomb survivor studies, particularly the effects of dose-rate and exposure protraction, modifiers of radiation risks (both environmental and host factors), and different types of radiation. These studies will therefore be important as a test of the adequacy of the current scientific bases for the radiation protection of workers and the general public. An example is thyroid cancer risk in young children following the Chernobyl accident, which has brought attention to a very high sensitivity of very young children that was difficult to assess on the basis of atomic-bomb data alone. Radiation protection will also benefit from formal comparisons and combined analyses of data from populations with different exposure patterns and exposures. Finally, future epidemiological studies will be most valuable if they are well focused, designed specifically to answer outstanding radiation protection questions. An integrated approach based on epidemiology and mechanistic studies, in which epidemiologic studies are designed to test specific mechanistic hypotheses and realistic mechanistic models are used for the analysis of epidemiological data, will probably be the most fruitful for radiation protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11281203     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200104000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  5 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Developing integrated multistate environmental public health surveillance.

Authors:  Daniel Wartenberg; W Douglas Thompson; Edward F Fitzgerald; Hillary J Gross; Suzanne K Condon; Nancy Kim; Barbara D Goun; Richard E Opiekun
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

3.  Are passive smoking, air pollution and obesity a greater mortality risk than major radiation incidents?

Authors:  Jim T Smith
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Spatial epidemiology: current approaches and future challenges.

Authors:  Paul Elliott; Daniel Wartenberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Is exposure to ionising radiation associated with childhood cardiac arrhythmia in the Russian territories contaminated by the Chernobyl fallout? A cross-sectional population-based study.

Authors:  Jean-Rene Jourdain; Geraldine Landon; Enora Clero; Vladimir Doroshchenko; Aleksandr Silenok; Irina Kurnosova; Andrei Butsenin; Isabelle Denjoy; Didier Franck; Jean-Pierre Heuze; Patrick Gourmelon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.