Literature DB >> 11281122

Discrepant analysis is still at large.

M Sternberg.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11281122      PMCID： PMC87834          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.39.2.826-827.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Discrepant analysis: a biased and an unscientific method for estimating test sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  A Hadgu
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Discrepant analysis: how can we test a test?

Authors:  A J McAdam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test.

Authors:  T A Alonzo; M S Pepe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  M Chernesky; J Sellors; J Mahony
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Bias in discrepant analysis: when two wrongs don't make a right.

Authors:  W C Miller
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Discrepant analysis--or behaviour?

Authors:  J Hilden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-09-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard.

Authors:  L Joseph; T W Gyorkos; L Coupal
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Detection of Streptococcus pyogenes by use of Illumigene group A Streptococcus assay.

Authors:  Amanda M Henson; Donna Carter; Kathleen Todd; Stanford T Shulman; Xiaotian Zheng
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.948
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.