Literature DB >> 11281033

Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders.

R Blanchard1, P Klassen, R Dickey, M E Kuban, T Blak.   

Abstract

The specificity of phallometric testing for pedophilia has been calculated using sex offenders against adult women. Does the offender's actual number of prior sexual contacts with women affect such estimates? To answer this, the authors' studied 82 male sex offenders against adult women, 172 offenders against unrelated children, and 70 offenders against their own biological children or stepchildren. Phallometric testing included visual and auditory depictions of prepubescent, pubescent, and adult males and females. The results for offenders against women showed that those who had had sexual contact with the greatest number of women (consenting or nonconsenting) had the lowest probability of being diagnosed as pedophilic. Specificity, calculated for those who had sexual contact with the most women and thus the most evidence of attraction to them, was 96%. Sensitivity, calculated analogously for men with the most offenses against children, was 61%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11281033     DOI: 10.1037//1040-3590.13.1.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  14 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimaging in pedophilia.

Authors:  Christine Wiebking; Georg Northoff
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Reply to Zietsch and Sidari: Male sexual arousal patterns (and sexual orientation) are partly unidimensional.

Authors:  J Michael Bailey; J Jabbour
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  [Pedophilia: etiology, diagnostics and therapy].

Authors:  P Fromberger; K Jordan; J L Müller
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Sexual attraction to others: a comparison of two models of alloerotic responding in men.

Authors:  Ray Blanchard; Michael E Kuban; Thomas Blak; Philip E Klassen; Robert Dickey; James M Cantor
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2010-09-17

5.  Offence-Supportive Cognitions, Atypical Sexuality, Problematic Self-Regulation, and Perceived Anonymity Among Online and Contact Sexual Offenders Against Children.

Authors:  Sarah Paquette; Franca Cortoni
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 6.  Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Michael C Seto; Martin L Lalumière; Ellen Laan; Teresa Grimbos
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2010-01-05

7.  Meta-Analyses of Fraternal and Sororal Birth Order Effects in Homosexual Pedophiles, Hebephiles, and Teleiophiles.

Authors:  Ray Blanchard; Klaus M Beier; Francisco R Gómez Jiménez; Dorit Grundmann; Jurian Krupp; Scott W Semenyna; Paul L Vasey
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-09-07

8.  The eyes have it: sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns.

Authors:  Gerulf Rieger; Ritch C Savin-Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Neurobiology and Psychology of Pedophilia: Recent Advances and Challenges.

Authors:  Gilian Tenbergen; Matthias Wittfoth; Helge Frieling; Jorge Ponseti; Martin Walter; Henrik Walter; Klaus M Beier; Boris Schiffer; Tillmann H C Kruger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Changed processing of visual sexual stimuli under GnRH-therapy--a single case study in pedophilia using eye tracking and fMRI.

Authors:  Kirsten Jordan; Peter Fromberger; Helge Laubinger; Peter Dechent; Jürgen L Müller
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.