Literature DB >> 11280651

Comparative clinical trial of progressive dilatational and forceps dilatational tracheostomy.

L W Van Heurn1, W B Mastboom, C I Scheeren, P R Brink, G Ramsay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and early complications of progressive dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and forceps dilatational tracheostomy (FDT).
DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial.
SETTING: Three-centre university and public teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: One hundred and twenty-seven consecutive patients were randomized to undergo PDT or FDT.
RESULTS: The duration of the procedure was 7.0 +/- 3.5 min in the PDT group and 6.4 +/- 4.9 min in the FDT group, which was not significantly different. Intraprocedural complications occurred in 14 % with PDT and 31% with FDT (p = 0.03), and were usually minor. Difficult or false insertion of the cannula in eight patients after FDTwas the most common complication.
CONCLUSIONS: Both percutaneous tracheostomy techniques are safe. The early complication rate of PDT appeared to be lower than FDT, but the early complication rate of FDT may be decreased significantly with small modifications to the set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11280651     DOI: 10.1007/s001340000743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  10 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy--a review of current techniques and their pitfalls.

Authors:  Jonathan Cools-Lartigue; Ali Aboalsaud; Heather Gill; Lorenzo Ferri
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Safety of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in patients ventilated with high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).

Authors:  Martin Beiderlinden; Harald Groeben; Jürgen Peters
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomies in a newly established trauma center: a report from Qatar.

Authors:  A Parchani; R Peralta; A El-Menyar; M Tuma; A Zarour; S Kumar; H Abdulrahman; Y AbdulRahman; H Al-Thani; R Latifi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Videobronchoscopic guidance makes percutaneous dilational tracheostomy safer.

Authors:  M Oberwalder; H Weis; H Nehoda; R Kafka-Ritsch; H Bonatti; R Prommegger; F Aigner; C Profanter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Clinical review: percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.

Authors:  Mariam A Al-Ansari; Mohammed H Hijazi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christian Putensen; Nils Theuerkauf; Ulf Guenther; Maria Vargas; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Elective Tracheotomy Practices in Turkey.

Authors:  Bulent Gucyetmez; Hakan Korkut Atalan; Nahit Cakar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Percutaneous tracheostomy.

Authors:  Chitra Mehta; Yatin Mehta
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2017-01

9.  Comparison of two percutaneous tracheostomy techniques, guide wire dilating forceps and Ciaglia Blue Rhino: a sequential cohort study.

Authors:  Bernard G Fikkers; Marieke Staatsen; Sabine G G F Lardenoije; Frank J A van den Hoogen; Johannes G van der Hoeven
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Tracheostomy in Adult Intensive Care Unit: An ISCCM Expert Panel Practice Recommendations.

Authors:  Sachin Gupta; Subhal Dixit; Dhruva Choudhry; Deepak Govil; Rajesh Chandra Mishra; Srinivas Samavedam; Kapil Zirpe; Shrikanth Srinivasan; Zubair Mohamed; Kv Venkatesha Gupta; Jaya Wanchoo; Nilanchal Chakrabortty; Sushma Gurav
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.