Literature DB >> 11280149

Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital.

J H Larrabee1, S Boldreghini, K Elder-Sorrells, Z M Turner, R G Wender, J M Hart, P S Lenzi.   

Abstract

Economic pressures on healthcare systems have intensified the necessity of demonstrating the unique contribution of nursing care to patient outcomes. The use of nursing information systems (NIS) has increased completeness of some nursing documentation elements. This study's purpose was to evaluate differences in documentation completeness of nurse assessments of patient outcomes (NASSESS), achievement of patient outcomes (NGOAL), nursing interventions done (NQUAL), and routine assessments before and after implementation of an NIS in a 100-bed urban university hospital in west Tennessee and before and after retraining in NIS use and care planning. NIS implementation did not improve documentation within the first six months. However, retraining and continued NIS use did significantly improve NASSESS, NGOAL, NQUAL, and blood pressure documentation 18 months postimplementation. Nurses must evaluate documentation completeness before and periodically after NIS implementation, using results to improve patient record data validity for patient care decisions, quality improvement, and research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11280149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Nurs        ISSN: 0736-8593


  9 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review.

Authors:  M J Van Der Meijden; H J Tange; J Troost; A Hasman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians.

Authors:  Peter J Embi; Thomas R Yackel; Judith R Logan; Judith L Bowen; Thomas G Cooney; Paul N Gorman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Effects of a computer-based nursing documentation system on the quality of nursing documentation.

Authors:  Cornelia Mahler; Elske Ammenwerth; Andreas Wagner; Angelika Tautz; Torsten Happek; Bettina Hoppe; Ronald Eichstädter
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Nursing audit as a method for developing nursing care and ensuring patient safety.

Authors:  Minna Mykkänen; Kaija Saranto; Merja Miettinen
Journal:  NI 2012 (2012)       Date:  2012-06-23

5.  The feasibility of integrating the Omaha system data across home care agencies and vendors.

Authors:  Bonnie L Westra; Cristina Oancea; Kay Savik; Karen Dorman Marek
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 6.  Strategies to Improve Compliance with Clinical Nursing Documentation Guidelines in the Acute Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review and Analysis.

Authors:  Jeanette Bunting; Melissa de Klerk
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2022-02-14

7.  Maintaining a consistent big picture: meaningful use of a Web-based POC EHR system.

Authors:  Gail M Keenan; Elizabeth Yakel; Yingwei Yao; Dianhui Xu; Laura Szalacha; Dana Tschannen; Yvonne Ford; Yu-Chung Chen; Andrew Johnson; Karen Dunn Lopez; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Int J Nurs Knowl       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 1.222

8.  The nurse-patient trajectory framework.

Authors:  Gregory L Alexander
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2007

Review 9.  WITHDRAWN: Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Christine Urquhart; Rosemary Currell; Maria J Grant; Nicholas R Hardiker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.