Literature DB >> 11279805

Single-participant research design. Bringing science to managed care.

D L Morgan1, R K Morgan.   

Abstract

The ongoing transition to managed health care continues to have repercussions for health care providers, perhaps the most important of which is an emphasis on accountability for demonstrating the usefulness of clinical interventions. This requirement places a premium on intervention research and highlights the historically strained relationship between psychological research and professional practice. In the midst of this challenge, researchers have increasingly criticized the logic and practice of traditional null hypothesis significance testing. This article describes the history, epistemology, and advantages of single-participant research designs for behavioral scientists and professionals in clinical settings. Although its lack of correspondence with the Fisherian tradition has precluded widespread adoption, the single-participant alternative features a design power and flexibility well suited to both basic science and applied research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11279805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  15 in total

1.  The selectionist meaning of C. S. Peirce and B. F. Skinner.

Authors:  Roy A Moxley
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2002

2.  Applying the Taxonomy of Validity Threats from Mainstream Research Design to Single-Case Experiments in Applied Behavior Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir; James E Carr
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2018-09-20

Review 3.  Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.

Authors:  Justin D Smith
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-07-30

4.  Optimizing behavioral health interventions with single-case designs: from development to dissemination.

Authors:  Jesse Dallery; Bethany R Raiff
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Hypnosis in the treatment of depression: considerations in research design and methods.

Authors:  Barbara S McCann; Sara J Landes
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2010-04

6.  Feasibility of intensive parent-child interaction therapy (I-PCIT): Results from an open trial.

Authors:  Paulo A Graziano; Daniel M Bagner; Janine Slavec; Gabriela Hungerford; Kristine Kent; Dara Babinski; Karen Derefinko; Dave Pasalich
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2015-03-01

7.  A critical examination of best dose analysis for determining cognitive-enhancing potential of drugs: studies with rhesus monkeys and computer simulations.

Authors:  Paul L Soto; Jesse Dallery; Nancy A Ator; Brian R Katz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Single-case experimental designs to evaluate novel technology-based health interventions.

Authors:  Jesse Dallery; Rachel N Cassidy; Bethany R Raiff
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  On the utility of within-participant research design when working with patients with neurocognitive disorders.

Authors:  Hanna Steinunn Steingrimsdottir; Erik Arntzen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Less Is More: Psychologists Can Learn More by Studying Fewer People.

Authors:  Matthew P Normand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.