Literature DB >> 11279322

False-negative and false-positive ECG diagnoses of Q wave myocardial infarction in the presence of right bundle-branch block.

I Gussak1, R S Wright, P Bjerregaard, B R Chaitman, S H Zhou, S C Hammill, S L Kopecky.   

Abstract

Right bundle-branch block (RBBB) has not traditionally been seen as an obstacle to ECG diagnosis of Q wave myocardial infarction (MI)--in clinical electrocardiography and vectorcardiography--because this conduction disturbance is not believed to cause significant alterations in the spatial orientation of initial excitation wavefronts. In the era of large-scale clinical trials, however, where serial ECG analysis is among the major diagnostic tools in MI classification, both false-positive and false-negative diagnoses of MI in the presence of RBBB have become increasingly evident. Because of the limited detectability of Q wave MI by ECG in the presence of RBBB, the electrocardiographic finding of Q wave MI should not be regarded as an independent diagnostic tool. It is best to utilize independent corroboration to establish the diagnosis of transmural infarction when RBBB is present. Further investigations are warranted to better delineate sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of Q wave MI in the presence of RBBB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11279322     DOI: 10.1159/000047312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiology        ISSN: 0008-6312            Impact factor:   1.869


  2 in total

1.  The Selvester QRS Score is more accurate than Q waves and fragmented QRS complexes using the Mason-Likar configuration in estimating infarct volume in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Mary G Carey; Andrew J Luisi; Sunil Baldwa; Salah Al-Zaiti; Marc J Veneziano; Robert A deKemp; John M Canty; James A Fallavollita
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  Assessment tools for unrecognized myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional analysis of the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke population.

Authors:  Emily B Levitan; Monika M Safford; Meredith L Kilgore; Elsayed Z Soliman; Stephen P Glasser; Suzanne E Judd; Paul Muntner
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.298

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.