Literature DB >> 11279321

Which lead for Q-T interval measurements?

P P Davey1.   

Abstract

There are several Q-T interval measures (individual lead, mean Q-T interval or Q-T dispersion) from a 12-lead ECG. Which should be used? As the ECG provides twelve different measures of the heart's "true" Q-T interval, and as, "a priori", no one measure is any better or worse than any other measure at estimating the "true" Q-T interval, the best measure is the average of these twelve measures, i.e., the mean Q-T interval. The best single lead to measure the Q-T interval is the lead that relates most closely to the mean Q-T interval which in 49 subjects with cardiac diseases was lead V(3), then lead II. The longest lead Q-T interval relates poorly to the mean and to the individual lead Q-T intervals and therefore carried information different to and quite unique from these measures. This unique information is Q-T dispersion which relates well to the longest lead Q-T interval (r = 0.71, p < 0.001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11279321     DOI: 10.1159/000047311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiology        ISSN: 0008-6312            Impact factor:   1.869


  3 in total

1.  Man versus Machine: Comparison of Automated and Manual Methodologies for Measuring the QTc Interval: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Jean T Barbey; Margaret Connolly; Brenda Beaty; Mori J Krantz
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Choice of an alternative lead for QT interval measurement in serial ECGs when Lead II is not suitable for analysis.

Authors:  Vaibhav Salvi; Dilip R Karnad; Vaibhav Kerkar; Gopi Krishna Panicker; Deepak Manohar; Mili Natekar; Snehal Kothari; Dhiraj Narula; Yash Lokhandwala
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-08-01

3.  Evaluation of Hypoglycaemia with Non-Invasive Sensors in People with Type 1 Diabetes and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycaemia.

Authors:  Ole Elvebakk; Christian Tronstad; Kåre I Birkeland; Trond G Jenssen; Marit R Bjørgaas; Kathrine F Frøslie; Kristin Godang; Håvard Kalvøy; Ørjan G Martinsen; Hanne L Gulseth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.