Literature DB >> 11277657

The role of cytoreductive surgery in the management of stage IV uterine papillary serous carcinoma.

R E Bristow1, L R Duska, F J Montz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival impact of cytoreductive surgery and other prognostic determinants in patients with Stage IV uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC).
METHODS: All patients with FIGO Stage IV UPSC diagnosed between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 1998 were identified from tumor registry databases. Individual patient data were collected retrospectively. Survival analysis and comparisons were performed using the method of Kaplan and Meier, the log-rank test, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Predictors of surgical outcome were evaluated using the log-rank test.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent primary cytoreductive surgery for Stage IV UPSC (median age, 65 years). The median survival for all patients was 14.4 months. Optimal cytoreduction was defined as residual disease < or =1 cm in maximal diameter. The only significant predictor of a suboptimal surgical outcome was the presence of disease in three or more anatomic regions. Overall, 16 of 31 patients (51.6%) completed primary surgery with optimal disease status. Optimal cytoreduction was associated with a median survival of 26.2 months, compared with 9.6 months for patients left with suboptimal residual disease (P < 0.001). At 24 months, 57.1% of optimally cytoreduced patients were still alive, compared with just 6.7% of patients left with suboptimal disease. Furthermore, patients with only microscopic residual tumor had a significantly longer median survival (30.4 months) than both patients with 0.1- to 1.0-cm residual disease (20.5 months) and those left with suboptimal disease (P = 0.004). Postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with a median survival of 17.1 months, compared with 9.5 months without such therapy (P = 0.018). Patients receiving the combination of platinum + paclitaxel had a median survival rate of 29.1 months versus 14.4 months for patients receiving platinum + cyclophosphamide +/- doxorubicin (P = 0.054). On multivariate analysis, the only statistically significant predictor of survival was the cytoreductive surgical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: The strongest predictor of overall survival for patients with Stage IV UPSC was the amount of residual disease following surgery. Recommended management for this group of patients should consist of maximal surgical cytoreduction followed by platinum-based chemotherapy, preferably in combination with paclitaxel. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11277657     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.6110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  14 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary cytoreductive surgery for stage IV uterine serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Ivy Wilkinson-Ryan; Antonina I Frolova; Jingxia Liu; L Stewart Massad; Premal H Thaker; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch; Andrea R Hagemann
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for advanced-stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  N M de Lange; N P M Ezendam; J S Kwon; I Vandenput; D Mirchandani; F Amant; L J M van der Putten; J M A Pijnenborg
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Factors prognostic of survival in advanced-stage uterine serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura L Holman; Navdeep Pal; David A Iglesias; Pamela T Soliman; Nyla Balakrishnan; Ann Klopp; Russell R Broaddus; Nicole D Fleming; Mark F Munsell; Karen H Lu; Shannon N Westin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: state of the state.

Authors:  R Wendel Naumann
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Therapeutic dilemmas in the management of uterine papillary serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Felice D Lackman; Peter S Craighead
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2003-04

6.  Primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin B Albright; Karen A Monuszko; Samantha J Kaplan; Brittany A Davidson; Haley A Moss; Allan B Huang; Alexander Melamed; Jason D Wright; Laura J Havrilesky; Rebecca A Previs
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 10.693

7.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in patients with serous endometrial cancer with transperitoneal spread (stage IV): a new preferred treatment?

Authors:  I Vandenput; B Van Calster; A Capoen; K Leunen; P Berteloot; P Neven; Ph Moerman; I Vergote; F Amant
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Clinicopathologic study in uterine cancer.

Authors:  I Vandenput
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2011

9.  Practice guidelines for management of uterine corpus cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Shin Wha Lee; Taek Sang Lee; Dae Gy Hong; Jae Hong No; Dong Choon Park; Jae Man Bae; Seok Ju Seong; So Jin Shin; Woong Ju; Keun Ho Lee; Yoo Kyung Lee; Hanbyoul Cho; Chulmin Lee; Jiheum Paek; Hyun Jung Kim; Jeong Won Lee; Jae Weon Kim; Duk Soo Bae
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Use and outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic uterine cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Yongmei Huang; Alexander Melamed; Benjamin B Albright; Grace C Hillyer; Rebecca Previs; M S Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 5.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.