Literature DB >> 11276833

Biomechanical compression tests with a new implant for thoracolumbar vertebral body replacement.

C Knop1, U Lange, L Bastian, M Oeser, M Blauth.   

Abstract

The authors present an investigation into the biomechanical functioning of a new titanium implant for vertebral body replacement (Synex). Possible indications are fractures and/or dislocations with damage of the anterior column, posttraumatic kyphosis and tumors of the thoracolumbar spine. The construction must be supplemented by a stabilizing posterior or anterior implant. For best fit and contact with adjacent end-plates, Synex is distractable in situ. We performed comparative compression tests with Synex and MOSS ("Harms mesh cage") on human cadaveric specimens of intact vertebrae (L1). The aim of the study was to measure the compressive strength of the vertebral body end-plate in uniaxial loading via both implants to exclude collapse of Synex in vivo. Twelve human cadaveric specimens of intact vertebrae (L1) were divided into two identical groups (matched pairs) according to bone mineral density (BMD), determined using dual-energy quantitative computed tomography (DE-QCT). The specimens were loaded with an axial compression force at a constant speed of 5 mm/min to failure, and the displacement was recorded with a continuous load-displacement curve. The mean ultimate compression force (Fmax) showed a tendency towards a higher reading for Synex: 3396 N versus 2719 N (non-significant). The displacement until Fmax was 2.9 mm in the Synex group, which was half as far as in the MOSS group (5.8 mm). The difference was significant (P < 0.001). The compression force was twice as high, and significantly (P < 0.05) higher with Synex at displacements of 1 mm, 1.5 mm and 2 mm. A significant (P < 0.001) correlation (R = 0.89) between Fmax and BMD was found. Synex was found to be at least comparable to MOSS concerning the compressive performance at the vertebral end-plate. A possible consequence of the significantly higher mean compression forces between 1 and 2 mm displacement might be decreased collapse of the implant into the vertebral body in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11276833      PMCID: PMC3611473          DOI: 10.1007/s005860000211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  14 in total

1.  [An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies].

Authors:  M Reinhold; W Schmölz; F Canto; D Krappinger; M Blauth; C Knop
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Titanium vertebral body replacement of adjustable size. A prospective clinical trial].

Authors:  U Lange; S Edeling; C Knop; L Bastian; C Krettek; M Blauth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Endoscopic surgery on the thoracolumbar junction of the spine.

Authors:  Rudolf Beisse
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Endoscopic surgery on the thoracolumbar junction of the spine.

Authors:  Rudolf Beisse
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Hounsfield units as predictor for cage subsidence and loss of reduction: following posterior-anterior stabilization in thoracolumbar spine fractures.

Authors:  Bernhard Wilhelm Ullrich; Philipp Schenk; Ulrich J Spiegl; Thomas Mendel; Gunther Olaf Hofmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Anterior vertebroplasty of adjacent levels after vertebral body replacement.

Authors:  Florian Geiger; Konstantinos Kafchitsas; Michael Rauschmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Initial experience with the use of an expandable titanium cage as a vertebral body replacement in patients with tumors of the spinal column: a report of 95 patients.

Authors:  Ashwin Viswanathan; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr; Egon Doppenberg; Dima Suki; Ziya Gokaslan; Ehud Mendel; Ganesh Rao; Laurence D Rhines
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Combined posterior-anterior stabilisation of thoracolumbar injuries utilising a vertebral body replacing implant.

Authors:  Christian Knop; T Kranabetter; M Reinhold; M Blauth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Harms titanium mesh cage fracture.

Authors:  Zdenek Klezl; Carlos A Bagley; Markus J Bookland; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Zdenek Rezek; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation--a systematic literature review.

Authors:  J Goldhahn; N Suhm; S Goldhahn; M Blauth; B Hanson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.