Literature DB >> 11276572

Socioeconomic differences in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and fruit juices. The influence of psychosocial factors.

M Lindström1, B S Hanson, E Wirfält, P O Ostergren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate whether social network and social support factors can explain socioeconomic differences in the risk of consuming low amounts of vegetables, fruit and fruit juices.
METHODS: The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study was a prospective cohort study. The present cross-sectional study examined data from a subpopulation of 11,837 individuals that completed baseline examinations in 1992-1994. Dietary habits were assessed using a modified diet history method, and socioeconomic and social network factors were measured with a structured questionnaire. Low consumption was defined as the lowest consumption quartile for vegetables and fruit, while fruit juice consumption was dichotomized to separate users from non-users.
RESULTS: Socioeconomic differences were most pronounced regarding the consumption of vegetables and fruit juices. For both sexes, unskilled manual workers had a twice as high risk of low vegetable and fruit juice consumption as higher non-manual employees. No socioeconomic differences in fruit consumption were observed for men, and only moderate differences for women with a higher consumption in higher socioeconomic groups. When the psychosocial variables were introduced in the multivariate model, social participation moderately reduced the socioeconomic differences in vegetable consumption, and the female socioeconomic differences in fruit consumption, but had no effect on the socioeconomic differences in fruit juice consumption. The other psychosocial variables had no effect on the socioeconomic differences.
CONCLUSION: Considerable socioeconomic differences in vegetable, fruit and fruit juice consumption were observed. Social participation seemed to be a strong determinant for these food choices. However, this effect was largely independent of the socioeconomic differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11276572     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/11.1.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  15 in total

1.  Appealing to vanity: could potential appearance improvement motivate fruit and vegetable consumption?

Authors:  Ross D Whitehead; Gozde Ozakinci; Ian D Stephen; David I Perrett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The influence of social involvement, neighborhood aesthetics, and community garden participation on fruit and vegetable consumption.

Authors:  Jill S Litt; Mah-J Soobader; Mark S Turbin; James W Hale; Michael Buchenau; Julie A Marshall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Exploring ecological, emotional and social levers of self-rated health for urban gardeners and non-gardeners: A path analysis.

Authors:  J S Litt; S J Schmiege; J W Hale; M Buchenau; F Sancar
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Eating Behaviors and Social Capital are Associated with Fruit and Vegetable Intake Among Rural Adults.

Authors:  Cassandra M Johnson; Joseph R Sharkey; Wesley R Dean
Journal:  J Hunger Environ Nutr       Date:  2010-07-01

5.  Self-perceived health, quality of life, and health-related behavior in obesity: is social status a mediator?

Authors:  Nathalie T Burkert; Wolfgang Freidl; Johanna Muckenhuber; Willibald J Stronegger; Eva Rásky
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Psychosocial mediators between socioeconomic status and dietary habits among Japanese older adults.

Authors:  H Sugisawa; T Nomura; M Tomonaga
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.075

7.  Residential area deprivation predicts fruit and vegetable consumption independently of individual educational level and occupational social class: a cross sectional population study in the Norfolk cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC-Norfolk).

Authors:  Shamarina Shohaimi; Ailsa Welch; Sheila Bingham; Robert Luben; Nicholas Day; Nicholas Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Walking for transportation or leisure: what difference does the neighborhood make?

Authors:  Ming Wen; Namratha R Kandula; Diane S Lauderdale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Neighborhood socioeconomic status and non school physical activity and body mass index in adolescent girls.

Authors:  Carolyn C Voorhees; Dianne J Catellier; J Scott Ashwood; Deborah A Cohen; Ariane Rung; Leslie Lytle; Terry L Conway; Marsha Dowda
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2009-11

10.  Social capital, health behaviours and health: a population-based associational study.

Authors:  Tarja Nieminen; Ritva Prättälä; Tuija Martelin; Tommi Härkänen; Markku T Hyyppä; Erkki Alanen; Seppo Koskinen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.