Literature DB >> 11275494

Harm reduction - a historical view from the left.

S R. Friedman1, M Southwell, R Bueno, D Paone, J Byrne, N Crofts.   

Abstract

The harm reduction movement formed during a period in which social movements of the working class and the excluded were weak, neo-liberalism ideologically triumphant, and potential opposition movements were viewed as offering "tinkering" with the system rather than a total social alternative. This climate shaped and limited the perspectives, strategies, and tactics of harm reductionists almost everywhere. In many countries, this period was also marked by a "political economy of scapegoating" that often targeted drug users as the cause of social woes. This scapegoating took the form of "divide and rule" political initiatives by business and political leaderships to prevent social unrest in a long period of worldwide economic trends toward lowered profit rates and toward increasing income inequality. However, times have changed. Mass strikes and other labor struggles, opposition to the World Trade Organisation and other agencies of neo-liberalism, community-based protests against belt-tightening, and other forms of social unrest have been increasing in many countries. This opens up the possibility of new allies for the harm reduction movement, but also poses difficult problems for which we need to develop answers. On-the-ground experience in alliance formation needs to be combined with careful discussion of and research about what approaches work to convince other movements to work for and with harm reduction, and which approaches do not. Class differences within the harm reduction movement are likely to become more salient in terms of (a) creating internal tensions, (b) increasingly, opening up new ways in which working class harm reductionists can organize within their own communities and workplaces, and (c) producing different strategic orientations that will need to be discussed and debated. As a movement, we will need to find ways to accommodate and discuss differing perspectives, needs, and assessments of opportunities and threats without paralyzing harm reduction activities.

Year:  2001        PMID: 11275494     DOI: 10.1016/s0955-3959(01)00063-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Drug Policy        ISSN: 0955-3959


  7 in total

Review 1.  Addressing the "risk environment" for injection drug users: the mysterious case of the missing cop.

Authors:  Scott Burris; Kim M Blankenship; Martin Donoghoe; Susan Sherman; Jon S Vernick; Patricia Case; Zita Lazzarini; Stephen Koester
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  Syringe Decriminalization Advocacy in Red States: Lessons from the North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition.

Authors:  David H Cloud; Tessie Castillo; Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein; Manisha Dubey; Robert Childs
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 3.  Expanding the continuum of substance use disorder treatment: Nonabstinence approaches.

Authors:  Catherine E Paquette; Stacey B Daughters; Katie Witkiewitz
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-11-26

4.  Dialectical theory and the study of HIV/AIDS and other epidemics.

Authors:  Samuel R Friedman; Diana Rossi
Journal:  Dialect Anthropol       Date:  2011-12-01

5.  Does Adolescent Alcohol Harm Minimization Policy Exposure Reduce Adult Alcohol Problems? A Cross-National Comparison.

Authors:  Marina Epstein; Jennifer A Bailey; Madeline Furlong; Richard F Catalano; John W Toumbourou
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Has United States drug policy failed? And how could we know?

Authors:  Samuel R Friedman; Pedro Mateu-Gelabert; Diana Rossi
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.164

7.  Students as effective harm reductionists and needle exchange organizers.

Authors:  Kyle Barbour; Miriam McQuade; Brandon Brown
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2017-03-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.