C B Phillips1, M H Liang, O Sangha, E A Wright, A H Fossel, R A Lew, K K Fossel, N A Shadick. 1. Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Robert B. Brigham Multipurpose Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. cphillips@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To determine the age-specific prevalence of Lyme disease and whether preventive behaviors on Nantucket Island correlate with Lyme disease, we surveyed island residents. METHODS: A survey with questions on Lyme disease symptoms, history, and preventive behaviors was mailed to all residents. Respondents were stratified by likelihood of having had Lyme disease. A subsample was selected for examination, and then classified according to the Lyme disease national surveillance case definition. RESULTS: The overall lifetime prevalence of Lyme disease for Nantucket residents was 15% (CI, 10%-19.8%): 19% among females, and 11% among males. The prevalence was highest among age groups 0-16 and 30-49 years. Overall, 86% of the population practiced at least one behavior. The most frequently reported preventive behavior was checking oneself for ticks (80%), followed by wearing protective clothing (53%), avoiding tick areas (34%), and using tick repellent (11%). Younger individuals practiced fewer preventive behaviors than older individuals (p=0.001). Although males reported greater tick exposure than females, females uniformly practiced preventive behaviors more frequently (p=0.001). The practice of preventive behaviors was not associated with a history of Lyme disease, but finding more than 5 ticks per year on oneself was (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Lyme disease is highly prevalent on Nantucket Island. Young people are particularly at risk and health education should emphasize preventive behaviors less frequently practiced: using tick repellent, avoiding tick areas, and wearing protective clothing.
BACKGROUND: To determine the age-specific prevalence of Lyme disease and whether preventive behaviors on Nantucket Island correlate with Lyme disease, we surveyed island residents. METHODS: A survey with questions on Lyme disease symptoms, history, and preventive behaviors was mailed to all residents. Respondents were stratified by likelihood of having had Lyme disease. A subsample was selected for examination, and then classified according to the Lyme disease national surveillance case definition. RESULTS: The overall lifetime prevalence of Lyme disease for Nantucket residents was 15% (CI, 10%-19.8%): 19% among females, and 11% among males. The prevalence was highest among age groups 0-16 and 30-49 years. Overall, 86% of the population practiced at least one behavior. The most frequently reported preventive behavior was checking oneself for ticks (80%), followed by wearing protective clothing (53%), avoiding tick areas (34%), and using tick repellent (11%). Younger individuals practiced fewer preventive behaviors than older individuals (p=0.001). Although males reported greater tick exposure than females, females uniformly practiced preventive behaviors more frequently (p=0.001). The practice of preventive behaviors was not associated with a history of Lyme disease, but finding more than 5 ticks per year on oneself was (p=0.001). CONCLUSION:Lyme disease is highly prevalent on Nantucket Island. Young people are particularly at risk and health education should emphasize preventive behaviors less frequently practiced: using tick repellent, avoiding tick areas, and wearing protective clothing.
Authors: Jenny E Heller; Elizabeth Benito-Garcia; Nancy E Maher; Lori B Chibnik; Colin P Maher; Nancy A Shadick Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2008-09-16
Authors: Cécile Aenishaenslin; Pascal Michel; André Ravel; Lise Gern; François Milord; Jean-Philippe Waaub; Denise Bélanger Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Desirée Jacqueline Mathieu Angélique Beaujean; Marloes Bults; Jim Everardus van Steenbergen; Hélene Antoine Claire Marie Voeten Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Afrodita Marcu; Julie Barnett; David Uzzell; Konstantina Vasileiou; Susan O'Connell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 3.295