Literature DB >> 11274011

Preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) below 10 microg/l predicts neither the presence of prostate cancer nor the rate of postoperative PSA failure.

T A Stamey1.   

Abstract

Recent information on the relationship of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to prostate cancer and new reports on death rates in men warrant a reassessment of how we diagnose and treat prostate cancer. We now know for the first time that the annual death rate from prostate cancer in men > or =65 years of age is only 226 per 100 000 men. At least 40 000 of 100 000 men over age 65 (40%) have invasive prostate cancer as judged by examination of prostates in 3- to 4-mm step-sections. Thus, only 1 of every 177 men 65 years of age or older (226 in 40 000) with invasive prostate cancer dies annually from his cancer. Serum PSA between 2 and 10 microg/L is used almost universally as an indication to biopsy the prostate. When 10-20 biopsies are commonly taken, it is not surprising that approximately 40% of men are biopsy-positive for prostate cancer. Despite this reliance on serum PSA as an indication for biopsy, data at Stanford show no clinically useful relationship between preoperative serum PSA (in the range 2-10 mg/L) and the volume of Gleason grade 4/5 cancer or the volume of Gleason grades 3, 2, and 1 cancer, nor can we show any useful relationship of such preoperative PSA concentrations (2-10 microg/L) to biochemical PSA failure rates after radical prostatectomy. We urgently need a better serum marker for prostate cancer. Because PSA biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy are directly proportional to the amount of Gleason grade 4/5 cancer in the prostate, a serum marker of Gleason grade 4/5 carcinoma could be ideal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11274011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  4 in total

1.  Correlation between serum prostate-specific antigen and cancer volume in prostate glands of different sizes.

Authors:  Gustavo F Carvalhal; Saima N Daudi; Donghui Kan; Dana Mondo; Kimberly A Roehl; Stacy Loeb; William J Catalona
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Screening for prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Peter T Scardino; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 3.  [Transrectal ultrasound-guided punch biopsies of the prostate. Indication, technique, results, and complications].

Authors:  J Palisaar; T Eggert; M Graefen; A Haese; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Quantitative analysis of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1) gene expression in human prostatic tissues.

Authors:  T Nakamura; A Scorilas; C Stephan; G M Yousef; G Kristiansen; K Jung; E P Diamandis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.