Literature DB >> 11273989

Electromechanical mapping for detection of myocardial viability in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

H E Bøtker1, J F Lassen, F Hermansen, H Wiggers, P Søgaard, W Y Kim, M Bøttcher, L Thuesen, A K Pedersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the ability of electromechanical mapping of the left ventricle to distinguish between nonviable and viable myocardium in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Unipolar voltage amplitudes and local endocardial shortening were measured in 31 patients (mean+/-SD age, 62+/-8 years) with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction, 30+/-9%). Dysfunctional regions, identified by 3D echocardiography, were characterized as nonviable when PET revealed matched reduction of perfusion and metabolism and as viable when perfusion was reduced or normal and metabolism was preserved. Mean unipolar voltage amplitudes and local shortening differed among normal, nonviable, and viable dysfunctional segments. Coefficient of variation for local shortening exceeded differences between groups and did not allow distinction between normal and dysfunctional myocardium. Optimum nominal discriminatory unipolar voltage amplitude between nonviable and viable dysfunctional myocardium was 6.5 mV, but we observed a great overlap between groups. Individual cutoff levels calculated as a percentage of electrical activity in normal segments were more accurate in the detection of viable dysfunctional myocardium than a general nominal cutoff level. The optimum normalized discriminatory value was 68%. Sensitivity and specificity were 78% for the normalized discriminatory value compared with 69% for the nominal value (P:<0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Endocardial ECG amplitudes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy display a wide scatter, complicating the establishment of exact nominal values that allow distinction between viable and nonviable areas. Individual normalization of unipolar voltage amplitudes improves diagnostic accuracy. Electroanatomic mapping may enable identification of myocardial viability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11273989     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.103.12.1631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  16 in total

Review 1.  Endoventricular electromechanical mapping-the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of the NOGA XP Cardiac Navigation System.

Authors:  Peter J Psaltis; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Intramyocardial navigation and mapping for stem cell delivery.

Authors:  Peter J Psaltis; Andrew C W Zannettino; Stan Gronthos; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Visualization of three-dimensional cardiac electrical excitation using standard heart model and anterior and posterior magnetocardiogram.

Authors:  Kuniomi Ogata; Akihiko Kandori; Tsuyoshi Miyashita; Keiji Tsukada; Satoshi Nakatani; Wataru Shimizu; Hideaki Kanzaki; Kunio Miyatake; Satsuki Yamada; Shigeyuki Watanabe; Iwao Yamaguchi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  The role of integrated PET-CT scar maps for guiding ventricular tachycardia ablations.

Authors:  Timm Dickfeld; Christopher Kocher
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Myocardial hibernation in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Dinesh K Kalra; William A Zoghbi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Assessment of myocardial fibrosis by endoventricular electromechanical mapping in experimental nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Peter J Psaltis; Angelo Carbone; Darryl P Leong; Dennis H Lau; Adam J Nelson; Tim Kuchel; Troy Jantzen; Jim Manavis; Kerry Williams; Prashanthan Sanders; Stan Gronthos; Andrew C W Zannettino; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Pre to Intraoperative Data Fusion Framework for Multimodal Characterization of Myocardial Scar Tissue.

Authors:  Antonio R Porras; Gemma Piella; Antonio Berruezo; Juan Fernández-Armenta; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.316

8.  Positron emission tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2005-10-01

9.  Do ameroid constrictors reliably occlude porcine coronary arteries?

Authors:  Jeremy L Herrmann
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Histopathological validation of electromechanical mapping in assessing myocardial viability in a porcine model of chronic ischemia.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Marlos R Fernandes; Guilherme V Silva; Cristiano O Cardoso; John Canales; Amir Gahramenpour; Fred Baimbridge; Maria da Graça Cabreira-Hansen; Emerson C Perin
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.