Literature DB >> 11273933

Ventilatory support by continuous positive airway pressure breathing improves gas exchange as compared with partial ventilatory support with airway pressure release ventilation.

P Neumann1, G Hedenstierna.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In acute lung injury, airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) with superimposed spontaneous breathing improves gas exchange compared with controlled mechanical ventilation. However, the release of airway pressure below the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) level may provoke lung collapse. Therefore, we compared gas exchange and hemodynamics using a crossover design in nine pigs with oleic acid-induced lung injury during CPAP breathing and APRV with a release pressure level of 0 and 5 cm H(2)O. At an identical minute ventilation (V(E) 8 L/min) spontaneous breathing averaged 55%, 67%, and 100% of V(E) during the two APRV modes and CPAP, respectively. Because of the concept of APRV, mean airway pressure was highest during CPAP and lowest during APRV with a release pressure of 0 cm H(2)O. Shunt was reduced to almost half during CPAP (6.6% of Q(t)) compared with both APRV-modes (13.0% of Q(t)). Cardiac output and oxygen consumption, in contrast, were similar during all three ventilatory settings. Thus, in our lung injury model, CPAP was superior to partial ventilatory support using APRV with and without positive end-expiratory pressure. This may be attributable to beneficial effects of spontaneous breathing on gas exchange as well as to rapid lung collapse during the phases of airway pressure release below the CPAP level. These findings may suggest that the amount of mechanical ventilatory support using the APRV mode should be kept at the necessary minimum. IMPLICATIONS: Oxygenation is better with continuous positive airway pressure breathing than with partial mechanical ventilatory support using airway pressure release ventilation. Therefore, mechanical ventilatory support achieved by a cyclic release of airway pressure during APRV should be kept at the minimum level that enables enough ventilatory support for patients to avoid respiratory muscle fatigue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11273933     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200104000-00030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

Review 1.  Airway pressure release ventilation and biphasic positive airway pressure: a systematic review of definitional criteria.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Martyn Hawkins
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Applications of airway pressure release ventilation.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; A A El-Solh; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 3.  Partial ventilatory support modalities in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome-a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah M McMullen; Maureen Meade; Louise Rose; Karen Burns; Sangeeta Mehta; Robert Doyle; Dietrich Henzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The 30-year evolution of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV).

Authors:  Sumeet V Jain; Michaela Kollisch-Singule; Benjamin Sadowitz; Luke Dombert; Josh Satalin; Penny Andrews; Louis A Gatto; Gary F Nieman; Nader M Habashi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2016-05-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.