Literature DB >> 11273434

Sociology and psychology within the scope of scientific dishonesty.

P Riis.   

Abstract

A survey is undertaken based on qualitative analyses of the cases of scientific misconduct from the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty's first five years of collecting data, with additional information from selected international sources, in which underlying psychological motivations can be judged.

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 11273434     DOI： 10.1007/s11948-000-0020-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN： 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  3 in total

1.  Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey.

Authors:  Susan Eastwood; Pamela Derish; Evangeline Leash; Stephen Ordway
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  [Scientific misconduct and medical research in Norway].

Authors:  S I Bekkelund; A C Hegstad; O H Førde
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  1995-10-20

3.  Scientific dishonesty and good scientific practice.

Authors:  D Andersen; N H Axelsen; P Riis
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1993-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.