R Virmani1, A Farb, A J Carter, R M Jones. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC 20306-6000, USA. virmani@afip.osd.mil
Abstract
PURPOSE: External beam mediastinal radiation-induced accelerated coronary atherosclerotic heart disease in humans has been recognized, especially when the condition occurs in young persons. The purpose of the present study was to compare external beam radiation-induced accelerated coronary atherosclerosis in humans with that seen in the pig coronary arteries following radioactive stent placement. METHODS: A literature review of radiation-induced coronary artery disease was performed. In addition, clinical records and coronary histology from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Registry were reviewed from patients who had received external beam radiation for mediastinal malignancies. Coronary arteries from pigs that had radioactive coronary stent placement were evaluated from our stent pathology laboratory and analyzed for comparison with the human disease. RESULTS: In humans, the characteristics of the intimal plaque in accelerated atherosclerosis postradiation therapy were similar to that seen in typical atherosclerotic coronary disease in the absence of radiation therapy. However, medial thinning and adventitial fibrosis were the distinguishing pathologic arterial changes secondary to radiation seen in humans. Radioactive stent placement in pig coronary arteries produced similar changes to that observed in humans post-external beam radiation, consisting of medial injury and adventitial thickening accompanied by intimal foam cell collections, calcification, and necrotic core formation containing cholesterol clefts resulting in severe luminal narrowing. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation, delivered via external beam or radioactive stent, induces changes of intimal atherosclerosis with medial thinning and adventitial scarring in human and pig. Therefore, pending completion of long-term clinical studies, caution should be exercised before the widespread use of brachytherapy is advocated for the treatment and prevention of coronary restenosis.
PURPOSE: External beam mediastinal radiation-induced accelerated coronary atherosclerotic heart disease in humans has been recognized, especially when the condition occurs in young persons. The purpose of the present study was to compare external beam radiation-induced accelerated coronary atherosclerosis in humans with that seen in the pig coronary arteries following radioactive stent placement. METHODS: A literature review of radiation-induced coronary artery disease was performed. In addition, clinical records and coronary histology from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Registry were reviewed from patients who had received external beam radiation for mediastinal malignancies. Coronary arteries from pigs that had radioactive coronary stent placement were evaluated from our stent pathology laboratory and analyzed for comparison with the human disease. RESULTS: In humans, the characteristics of the intimal plaque in accelerated atherosclerosis postradiation therapy were similar to that seen in typical atherosclerotic coronary disease in the absence of radiation therapy. However, medial thinning and adventitial fibrosis were the distinguishing pathologic arterial changes secondary to radiation seen in humans. Radioactive stent placement in pig coronary arteries produced similar changes to that observed in humans post-external beam radiation, consisting of medial injury and adventitial thickening accompanied by intimal foam cell collections, calcification, and necrotic core formation containing cholesterol clefts resulting in severe luminal narrowing. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation, delivered via external beam or radioactive stent, induces changes of intimal atherosclerosis with medial thinning and adventitial scarring in human and pig. Therefore, pending completion of long-term clinical studies, caution should be exercised before the widespread use of brachytherapy is advocated for the treatment and prevention of coronary restenosis.
Authors: Fiona Anne Stewart; Sylvia Heeneman; Johannes Te Poele; Jacqueline Kruse; Nicola S Russell; Marion Gijbels; Mat Daemen Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Christian Templin; Jelena-Rima Ghadri; Christophe Wyss; Thomas F Lüscher; Philipp Kaufmann; Ulf Landmesser Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2009-12-29 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Joseph L Unthank; Steven J Miller; Ariel K Quickery; Ethan L Ferguson; Meijing Wang; Carol H Sampson; Hui Lin Chua; Matthew R DiStasi; Hailin Feng; Alexa Fisher; Barry P Katz; P Artur Plett; George E Sandusky; Rajendran Sellamuthu; Sasidhar Vemula; Eric P Cohen; Thomas J MacVittie; Christie M Orschell Journal: Health Phys Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Feng Gao; Jayashree Narayanan; Cortney Joneikis; Brian L Fish; Aniko Szabo; John E Moulder; Robert C Molthen; Elizabeth R Jacobs; R Nagarjun Rao; Meetha Medhora Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Matthew A Coleman; Sharath P Sasi; Jillian Onufrak; Mohan Natarajan; Krishnan Manickam; John Schwab; Sujatha Muralidharan; Leif E Peterson; Yuriy O Alekseyev; Xinhua Yan; David A Goukassian Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; William Finch; Despina Tsitlakidou; Tyler Josephs; Cezar Iliescu; John F Best; Eric H Yang Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 5.075