Literature DB >> 11272214

Treatment of esophageal and gastric tumors.

H Inoue1.   

Abstract

In the diagnosis of early cancer, there are differences in the pathological criteria used by Western and Asian (Japanese) pathologists. The Vienna classification advocated by pathologists offers standard pathological criteria common to all endoscopists, and it has clarified the indications for the treatment of superficial lesions, including high-grade dysplasia and mucosal cancer. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is increasingly being used in the treatment of early cancer. Experience with EMR in the treatment of Barrett's esophagus with cancer has been reported, and the preliminary results are encouraging. Some technical variations and improvements in EMR procedures have been described. As an injection agent, the use of mucinous substances such as sodium hyaluronate has been reported. A cutting knife with an insulated tip has been designed, making the use of the precutting technique much safer. Studies have been conducted comparing the freehand technique with the cap technique for EMR, and it was found that the cap technique is generally better. Ablative treatment has also been used in many cases, with satisfactory results. In advanced cancer, self-expanding metallic stents have been used for palliative treatment, with generally satisfactory results. The range of applications for therapeutic endoscopy has continued to expand during the last two years in the treatment of esophageal and gastric tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11272214     DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-11664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  8 in total

1.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection -- initial experience from India: a case series of five patients.

Authors:  Amol Bapaye; Advay Aher
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-07

2.  Endoscopic mucosal resection using a cap-fitted endoscope improves tissue resection and pathology interpretation: an animal study.

Authors:  James J Farrell; Gregory Y Lauwers; William R Brugge
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 3.  The impact of flexible endoscopy in esophageal surgery.

Authors:  Alejandro Nieponice; Fabio Nachman; Adolfo Badaloni; Franco Ciotola; Cecilia Zubieta; Mauricio Ramirez
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Nonsurgical approaches to esophageal malignancy.

Authors:  Darius Sorbi; David E Fleischer
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-06

5.  Management of early-stage esophageal neoplasia (MESEN) consensus.

Authors:  Alejandro Nieponice; Adolfo E Badaloni; Blair A Jobe; Toshitaka Hoppo; Carlos Pellegrini; Vic Velanovich; Gary W Falk; Kevin Reavis; Lee Swanstrom; Virender K Sharma; Fabio Nachman; Franco F Ciotola; Luis E Caro; Cecilio Cerisoli; Demetrio Cavadas; Luis Durand Figueroa; Daniel Pirchi; Michael Gibson; Santiago Elizalde; Henry Cohen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Upgrade of Lesions Initially Diagnosed as Low-Grade Gastric Dysplasia upon Forceps Biopsy Following Endoscopic Resection.

Authors:  Chan Sik Won; Mee Yon Cho; Hyun Soo Kim; Hye Jeong Kim; Ki Tae Suk; Moon Young Kim; Jae Woo Kim; Soon Koo Baik; Sang Ok Kwon
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Comparison of narrowband imaging with autofluorescence imaging for endoscopic visualization of superficial squamous cell carcinoma lesions of the esophagus.

Authors:  Haruhisa Suzuki; Yutaka Saito; Ichiro Oda; Tsuyoshi Kikuchi; Shinsuke Kiriyama; Shusei Fukunaga
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2012-10-30

8.  Clinical value of preventive balloon dilatation for esophageal stricture.

Authors:  Changxiong Wang; Xianghong Lu; Ping Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 2.447

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.