Literature DB >> 11271956

Sotalol vs metoprolol for ventricular rate control in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who have undergone digitalization: a single-blinded crossover study.

G E Kochiadakis1, E M Kanoupakis, M D Kalebubas, N E Igoumenidis, K E Vardakis, H E Mavrakis, P E Vardas.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the effects of sotalol and metoprolol on heart rate, during isotonic (ITE) and isometric (IME) exercise and daily activities, in digitalized patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The study had a randomized, single-blinded, crossover design. Twenty-three patients with chronic atrial fibrillation received placebo for 4 weeks, followed by a 4-week period of treatment with sotalol and metoprolol in random order. At the end of each period, the patients were assessed with 24-h ECG monitoring, a cardiopulmonary exercise test and a handgrip manoeuvre. Both agents produced a lower heart rate than placebo at rest and at all levels of isotonic exercise (P < 0.001) without affecting oxygen uptake. Sotalol produced a lower heart rate than metoprolol only at submaximal exercise (116 +/- 9 bpm for sotalol vs 125 +/- 11 bpm for metoprolol, P < 0.001). During isometric exercise, sotalol produced a lower maximum heart rate than did metoprolol (113 +/- 22 vs 129 +/- 18 bpm, respectively). Both agents produced a lower mean heart rate than placebo over 24 h (P < 0.001 for all), while sotalol produced a lower mean heart rate than metoprolol during the daytime (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Sotalol is a safe and effective agent for control of heart rate in digitalized patients with atrial fibrillation. Sotalol is superior to metoprolol at submaximal exercise, resulting in better rate control during daily activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11271956     DOI: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  4 in total

1.  Rate control in permanent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Theodora Nikolaidou; Kevin S Channer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-11-24

2.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  New-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Stephanie Sibley; John Muscedere
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 4.  Rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Muath Alobaida; Abdullah Alrumayh
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.