Literature DB >> 11271954

Adverse events with transvenous left ventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure: early experience from a single centre.

V Valls-Bertault1, J Mansourati, M Gilard, Y Etienne, S Munier, J J Blanc.   

Abstract

AIMS: Assessment of complications following implantation of transvenous ventricular electrodes to pace the left ventricle. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with severe cardiac failure and left bundle branch block were prospectively followed for adverse effects of implantation of a left ventricular transvenous pacing system. Immediate follow-up was associated with loss of left ventricular pacing in nine patients (32%). This was due to lead dislodgement in four cases (corrected by re-operation in three of these cases), and due to increased threshold in five cases (corrected by programming a higher pacing amplitude in all five cases, but with intermittent diaphragmatic contraction in one case). After 1 month, one patient died, one patient with severe coronary heart disease suffered a myocardial infarction, and left ventricular pacing was lost in two patients. Pericardial effusion, new significant ventricular arrhythmias or other adverse effects were not observed. After a mean follow-up of 16 +/- 9.2 months, pacing leads remained stable and no late complications related to the transvenous left ventricular epicardial pacing were observed.
CONCLUSION: Placement of a permanent lead in a tributary of the coronary sinus is feasible without serious adverse effects during the first month. The only frequent adverse event was lead dislodgement; a finding which emphasizes the need for development of specially designed leads for this application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11271954     DOI: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  6 in total

Review 1.  Are electronic cardiac devices still evolving?

Authors:  G Carrault; P Mabo
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

2.  Surgically placed left ventricular leads provide similar outcomes to percutaneous leads in patients with failed coronary sinus lead placement.

Authors:  Gorav Ailawadi; Damien J Lapar; Brian R Swenson; Cory D Maxwell; Micah E Girotti; James D Bergin; John A Kern; John P Dimarco; Srijoy Mahapatra
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Cardiac resynchronisation therapy: results from daily practice in Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem.

Authors:  A M Rolink; F W A Verheugt; H A Bosker
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Is the epicardial left ventricular lead implantation an alternative approach to percutaneous attempt in patients with Steinert disease? A case report.

Authors:  Andrea Antonio Papa; Anna Rago; Roberta Petillo; Paola D'Ambrosio; Marianna Scutifero; Marisa DE Feo; Ciro Maiello; Alberto Palladino
Journal:  Acta Myol       Date:  2017-12-01

5.  Pacemaker lead displacement: mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Beatriz Fuertes; Jorge Toquero; Ramón Arroyo-Espliguero; Ignacio F Lozano
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2003-10-01

6.  Epicardial left ventricular leads via minimally invasive technique: a role of steroid eluting leads.

Authors:  Etem Caliskan; Florian Fischer; Felix Schoenrath; Maximilian Y Emmert; Francesco Maisano; Volkmar Falk; Christoph T Starck; Tomas Holubec
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.637

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.