Literature DB >> 11271543

Choice of female-controlled barrier methods among young women and their male sexual partners.

A M Minnis1, N S Padian.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Little is known about the factors associated with the choice of female-controlled, over-the-counter barrier contraceptive methods among women and their male sexual partners.
METHODS: Predictors of method choice were assessed following an educational presentation on contraceptive use and risk reduction among 510 sexually active females aged 15-30 who were recruited in the San Francisco Bay Area. In addition, the primary partners of 160 of these women participated in the survey
RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of women who enrolled in the study alone, 25% of those who enrolled with their main partner and 18% of these male partners chose female-controlled, over-the-counter barrier methods alone. The strongest predictor of this choice was current use of a hormonal contraceptive both for women who participated in the study on their own (odds ratio, 2.1) and for those who enrolled their partner in the study (odds ratio, 6.3). Female-controlled methods were also chosen significantly more often by teenagers than by older women; for example, among those who enrolled with a male partner, the odds ratio for selection of a female-controlled barrier method by women younger than 18 was 6.0. Among women who enrolled without a partner, those who had had multiple partners in the previous six months and those who were current users of male condoms were less likely to choose female-controlled methods (odds ratios, 0.7 and 0.5, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of participants did not choose female-controlled, over-the-counter barrier methods without also choosing male condoms, such female-controlled methods appear to offer an acceptable alternative for prevention of sexually transmitted infections. They may be a particularly attractive option for individuals using hormonal contraceptives and for teenage women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11271543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  7 in total

Review 1.  Female-initiated barrier methods for the prevention of STI/HIV: where are we now? Where should we go?

Authors:  M Latka
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 2.  Moving beyond safe sex to women-controlled safe sex: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Kamila A Alexander; Christopher L Coleman; Janet A Deatrick; Loretta S Jemmott
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Acceptability of the Reality female condom and a latex prototype.

Authors:  M Latka; C Joanis; L Glover
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Reproductive health differences among Latin American- and US-born young women.

Authors:  A M Minnis; N S Padian
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Understanding Motivators and Challenges to Involving Urban Parents as Collaborators in HIV Prevention Research Efforts.

Authors:  Mary M McKay; Rogério M Pinto; William M Bannon; Vincent Guilamo-Ramos
Journal:  Soc Work Ment Health       Date:  2008-10-08

6.  Creating Mechanisms for Meaningful Collaboration Between Members of Urban Communities and University-Based HIV Prevention Researchers.

Authors:  Mary M McKay; Richard Hibbert; Rita Lawrence; Ana Miranda; Roberta Paikoff; Carl C Bell; Sybil Madison-Boyd; Donna Baptiste; Doris Coleman; Rogério M Pinto; William M Bannon
Journal:  Soc Work Ment Health       Date:  2007-01-01

7.  Views and experiences of the female condom in Australia: An exploratory cross-sectional survey of cisgender women.

Authors:  Sarah E Fenwick; Jessica R Botfield; Prudence Kidman; Kevin McGeechan; Deborah Bateson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.