Literature DB >> 11271312

Optimal FK 506 dosage in patients under primary immunosuppression following liver transplantation.

M Winkler1, R Pichlmayr, P Neuhaus, P McMaster, R Calne, G Otto, R Williams, H Bismuth, C Groth.   

Abstract

In a retrospective study, we analysed the FK 506 dosage used in primary liver graft recipients enrolled in the European FK 506 multicenter trial conducted from September 1990 to January 1992. In addition, a second cohort of patients treated more recently in a single centre was investigated. The impact of different dosing strategies on the clinical course of the patients was analysed with special emphasis on the incidence of rejection episodes and FK 506 side-effects. Among the patients enrolled in the European FK 506 multicenter trial, those patients enrolled during the "early" phase of the study received a higher oral FK 506 dose [mean oral dosage on day 7 = 0.19 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day, n = 134] compared to patients enrolled during the "late" period of the study (mean oral dosage on day 7 = 0.14 mg/kg bw per day, n = 133). This lower dosage was the result of several protocol amendments performed to reduce the incidence of FK 506 side-effects. Lowering of the FK 506 dosage was accompanied by a reduction in the long-term prevalence of side-effects such as diabetes (n. s.) or hypertension (P < 0.05), while patient survival and rejection frequency remained constant. Patients treated in centres with online FK 506 blood level monitoring experienced significantly less hypertension, less episodes of diabetes and less rejection episodes compared to patients treated in centres without. The clinical course of those patients enrolled in the multicentre trial was compared with the course of a cohort of liver-grafted patients treated with FK 506 more recently in a single centre. These patients had a further reduction in the FK 506 dosage (0.10 mg/kg bw per day p.o. or less according to whole blood levels, with no intravenous FK 506 administration). When compared to patients enrolled in the multicentre trial, these patients experienced less side-effects (nephrotoxicity, hypertension, serious early neurotoxicity) while adaequate immunosuppression was maintained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 11271312     DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.1994.tb01311.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  4 in total

1.  Daily dosing of tacrolimus in patients treated with HIV-1 therapy containing a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor or raltegravir.

Authors:  Markus Bickel; Evrim Anadol; Martin Vogel; Wolf Peter Hofmann; Nils von Hentig; Johannes Kuetscher; Michael Kurowski; Christian Moench; Tessa Lennemann; Thomas Lutz; Wolf Otto Bechstein; Hans Reinhard Brodt; Jürgen Rockstroh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  A risk-benefit assessment of tacrolimus in transplantation.

Authors:  M Winkler; U Christians
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Effects of tacrolimus on action potential configuration and transmembrane ion currents in canine ventricular cells.

Authors:  László Szabó; Norbert Szentandrássy; Kornél Kistamás; Bence Hegyi; Ferenc Ruzsnavszky; Krisztina Váczi; Balázs Horváth; János Magyar; Tamás Bányász; Balázs Pál; Péter P Nánási
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.