D Schilling1, G Haisch, N Sloot, R Jakobs, W Saggau, J F Riemann. 1. Department of Internal Medicine C, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Academic Medical Hospital of the Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Rhine, Germany. MedCLu@t-online.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The pathogenesis of stress ulceration in seriously ill patients is uncertain and the pathogenic role of Helicobacter pylori infection is unknown. We therefore assessed the seroprevalence of patients of a cardiosurgical intensive care unit (ICU) with clinically important stress ulcer bleeding. We compared this prevalence with a control group matched for this kind of surgical intervention, missing history of peptic ulcer disease, age and gender. DESIGN: Prospective survey. SETTING: Cardiosurgical ICU in a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand five hundred seventy cardiosurgical patients with intravenous ranitidine stress ulcer prophylaxis were screened for clinically important stress ulcer bleeding. Helicobacter pylori seropositivity was measured in all patients with a clinically important bleeding and in a control group of 245 consecutive cardiosurgical patients, matched for the kind of cardiosurgical intervention, age and gender. RESULTS: In 56 of 2,570 (2.1%) patients signs of clinically important bleeding were seen. Endoscopical examination revealed stress ulcer bleeding in 42 cases. The incidence of stress ulcer bleeding was 1.6%. The seropositivity of the group with ulcer bleeding was 45.2 % whereas 62.4 % of the patients in the control group were Helicobacter pylori positive (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the Helicobacter pylori infection does not play a pathogenic role in stress ulcer bleeding. Prophylactic cure of Helicobacter pylori can not be recommended in this setting.
OBJECTIVE: The pathogenesis of stress ulceration in seriously ill patients is uncertain and the pathogenic role of Helicobacter pylori infection is unknown. We therefore assessed the seroprevalence of patients of a cardiosurgical intensive care unit (ICU) with clinically important stress ulcer bleeding. We compared this prevalence with a control group matched for this kind of surgical intervention, missing history of peptic ulcer disease, age and gender. DESIGN: Prospective survey. SETTING: Cardiosurgical ICU in a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand five hundred seventy cardiosurgical patients with intravenous ranitidine stress ulcer prophylaxis were screened for clinically important stress ulcer bleeding. Helicobacter pylori seropositivity was measured in all patients with a clinically important bleeding and in a control group of 245 consecutive cardiosurgical patients, matched for the kind of cardiosurgical intervention, age and gender. RESULTS: In 56 of 2,570 (2.1%) patients signs of clinically important bleeding were seen. Endoscopical examination revealed stress ulcer bleeding in 42 cases. The incidence of stress ulcer bleeding was 1.6%. The seropositivity of the group with ulcer bleeding was 45.2 % whereas 62.4 % of the patients in the control group were Helicobacter pylori positive (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the Helicobacter pylori infection does not play a pathogenic role in stress ulcer bleeding. Prophylactic cure of Helicobacter pylori can not be recommended in this setting.
Authors: René Robert; Valérie Gissot; Marc Pierrot; Leila Laksiri; Emmanuelle Mercier; Gwenael Prat; Daniel Villers; Jean-François Vincent; Michel Hira; Philippe Vignon; Patrick Charlot; Christophe Burucoa Journal: Crit Care Date: 2006-05-16 Impact factor: 9.097