Literature DB >> 11271087

Retrospective evaluation of the simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) in a surgical intensive care unit.

R Lefering1, M Zart, E A Neugebauer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) with its original version, to provide reference values of daily TISS-28 assessment and to describe its association with severity of illness in surgical patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected audit data; four documentation periods.
SETTING: Ten-bed intensive care unit (ICU) in a surgical university hospital. PATIENTS: One thousand nine hundred eighty-six consecutive admissions (1,808 patients; 10,448 observation days) who stayed on ICU for at least 6 h. Patients were in hospital for abdominal, vascular or trauma surgery. The average age was 61.5 years, the mean APACHE II score on admission 10.3 points.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Raw data for APACHE II score and TISS were recorded daily. TISS-28 was calculated retrospectively from the original TISS data.
RESULTS: Average TISS-28 values (28.7 points; SD = 9.7) do not differ substantially from the original TISS values (28.2 points, SD = 10.9) and overall correlation is high (r = 0.935). Of the patients, 57.3 % left the ICU after 1-2 days as survivors with a mean daily TISS-28 of 20.0 points. Variability between documentation periods was higher with the original TISS. On average, patients with increasing severity of disease require an increasing amount of care. Survivors have lower TISS-28 values than non-survivors (27.6 vs 34.9).
CONCLUSIONS: In a surgical ICU the simplified version of TISS with 28 items (TISS-28) sufficiently reflects the amount of intensive care provided and may provide useful additional information on severity of disease and prognosis. It should replace the original index, at least in these cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11271087     DOI: 10.1007/s001340000723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  8 in total

1.  Measuring the nursing workload per shift in the ICU.

Authors:  Dieter P Debergh; Dries Myny; Isabelle Van Herzeele; Georges Van Maele; Dinis Reis Miranda; Francis Colardyn
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Reproducibility of physiological track-and-trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward.

Authors:  Christian P Subbe; Haiyan Gao; David A Harrison
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  [Nursing workload indices TISS-10, TISS-28, and NEMS : Higher workload with agitation and delirium is not reflected].

Authors:  U Guenther; F Koegl; N Theuerkauf; J Maylahn; U Andorfer; J Weykam; T Muders; C Putensen
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 0.840

4.  The way in which a physiotherapy service is structured can improve patient outcome from a surgical intensive care: a controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Susan D Hanekom; Quinette Louw; Andre Coetzee
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Application of Surgical Apgar Score in intracranial meningioma surgery.

Authors:  Shih-Yuan Hsu; Chien-Yu Ou; Yu-Ni Ho; Yu-Hua Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A one-year cost-utility analysis of REBOA versus RTACC for non-compressible torso haemorrhage.

Authors:  Maxwell S Renna; Cristiano van Zeller; Farah Abu-Hijleh; Cherlyn Tong; Jasmine Gambini; Mengyao Ma
Journal:  Trauma       Date:  2017-11-24

7.  Economic analysis of costs associated with a Respiratory Intensive Care Unit in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Northern India.

Authors:  Kumari Shweta; Sachin Kumar; Anil Kumar Gupta; Surinder Kumar Jindal; Ashok Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-03

8.  Getting the invite list right: a discussion of sepsis severity scoring systems in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis and randomized trial inclusion criteria.

Authors:  Matti Tolonen; Federico Coccolini; Luca Ansaloni; Massimo Sartelli; Derek J Roberts; Jessica L McKee; Ari Leppaniemi; Christopher J Doig; Fausto Catena; Timothy Fabian; Craig N Jenne; Osvaldo Chiara; Paul Kubes; Yoram Kluger; Gustavo P Fraga; Bruno M Pereira; Jose J Diaz; Michael Sugrue; Ernest E Moore; Jianan Ren; Chad G Ball; Raul Coimbra; Elijah Dixon; Walter Biffl; Anthony MacLean; Paul B McBeth; Juan G Posadas-Calleja; Salomone Di Saverio; Jimmy Xiao; Andrew W Kirkpatrick
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 5.469

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.